Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 08:32 AM Aug 2013

Is it time to lift Pete Rose's lifetime ban?

What say, all? A Rose by any other name....


9 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Not in this life -- or the afterlife, for that matter
3 (33%)
Yes, but no bust in the Hall
0 (0%)
Yes, and he deserves to be in Cooperstown
6 (67%)
Undecided
0 (0%)
Other (please explain)
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is it time to lift Pete Rose's lifetime ban? (Original Post) theHandpuppet Aug 2013 OP
Never, and we should some more lifetime bans. n/t JayhawkSD Aug 2013 #1
he bet on baseball when he was a manager Bully Taw Aug 2013 #2
That's the tragedy of it all. If he did this solely as a PLAYER. . . DinahMoeHum Aug 2013 #3
It won't happen Don Hunsberger Aug 2013 #4
You can still hurt the game betting on your own team. Zavulon Sep 2013 #5
I think that could arguably be the strongest argument Divine Discontent Sep 2013 #7
- 1917 Sep 2013 #6
 

Bully Taw

(194 posts)
2. he bet on baseball when he was a manager
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 09:08 PM
Aug 2013

And he bet on (and evidence suggests against) his own team. He called in to question the integrity of the game. The BlackSox did the same, and they are still banned, and rightfully so.

Steroid cheats may suffer the same fate at some point, but for now we can be sure that known steroid cheats will never get into the Hall at the hands of the BBWAA or the Veterans Committee.

DinahMoeHum

(22,507 posts)
3. That's the tragedy of it all. If he did this solely as a PLAYER. . .
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 12:02 PM
Aug 2013

. . .he'd be in the HOF by now.

The NFL football HOF has folks like Alex Karras and Paul Hornung who got suspended for awhile for betting on games. But they were players, NOT coaches.

Problem is, Pete Rose, as a coach and manager was in a position to influence the outcome of games. THAT is why the hammer came down real hard on him, and justifiably, IMO.

4. It won't happen
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 10:04 AM
Aug 2013

Pete Rose deserves to be in the Hall of Fame. His credentials are impeccable: he has more hits than anyone who ever played the game. Baseball's problem (or really that of the Baseball Writers of America) is not so much that Rose bet on baseball, but that he never, until recently, admitted it.
He never bet against his own team, so the only person harmed by Rose's betting was .... Rose.

But the BBWA have the only votes about who gains entry into Cooperstown. And for some reason, they refuse Rose.
My guess is that, while he lives, Rose will never gain admittance.

 

Zavulon

(5,639 posts)
5. You can still hurt the game betting on your own team.
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 08:50 AM
Sep 2013

For example, you can tinker with your rotation to have certain pitchers available on days when you're placing bets, making your team more likely to lose other games.

Rose lied for 15 years, and when he finally came clean it was to sell a book and it was during a Hall of Fame induction ceremony, where guys who were being welcomed into the Hall were being overshadowed by an egomaniacal gasbag who broke baseball's cardinal rule. I'd sooner vote for Mario Mendoza or any of the steroid freaks before voting for Rose.

What they should do is build a Hall of Statistical Achievement where everyone with a certain number of hits, homers, batting average, RBI and / or runs scored gains you admittance, along with similar standards for pitchers and their categories. Let everyone with 3,000 hits in, for example, and then the gasbag gets inducted into SOMETHING. I hope he never, ever, EVER gets into Cooperstown, and the Hall of Fame will cease to have meaning to me if he does.

Divine Discontent

(21,056 posts)
7. I think that could arguably be the strongest argument
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 01:09 PM
Sep 2013

I've said it myself, while still saying he should be in the hall, but the point is, he could have used John Franco more on the days he bet a lot, or left Browning in an extra inning even though he knew he was tired or such... I seriously wish there was a record of the bets we could see. I'd love to see if he bet on the Reds on the days that Eric was out of the lineup? LOL. But yeah, if there's a reason he won't get in while alive, it would be that he was the manager, and he could influence who he used to benefit himself, even if he never did it knowingly. I'd hate to find out that one of those FOUR 2nd place finishes was caused by his gambling....

 

1917

(14 posts)
6. -
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 10:28 AM
Sep 2013

Time will pass and he'll eventually be admitted. Look at Nixon. Half these kids never even heard of him.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Baseball»Is it time to lift Pete R...