Past two series of the Stros ... double ball widths away from the plate, sloppy. That batter interference seemed exotic, and frankly, the Astros don’t need any ‘help’.

BeyondGeography

(40,014 posts)

14. They've been terrible and there will be no accountability

Reply to Mersky (Reply #12)

Tue Oct 29, 2019, 10:19 PM

Oct 2019

Mersky

(5,268 posts)

15. I'm getting that picture

Reply to BeyondGeography (Reply #14)

Tue Oct 29, 2019, 10:29 PM

Oct 2019

I don’t like it. Nope.

Do you know how their numbers are chosen? Was having issues with #88, Eddings the other night.

But anyhow, I don’t like exotic calls.

JudyM

(29,517 posts)

8. Spoken like a true honorable Democrat.

Reply to Mersky (Reply #4)

Tue Oct 29, 2019, 10:06 PM

Oct 2019

Mersky

(5,268 posts)

10. Thanks. I like the Nats.

Reply to JudyM (Reply #8)

Tue Oct 29, 2019, 10:08 PM

Oct 2019

I always want a fair game. That was just odd. Stros are my team, but dang, I don’t like seeing BS interjected into a game.

greyl

(22,997 posts)

17. About the need to run between the lines...

Reply to Mersky (Reply #4)

Tue Oct 29, 2019, 10:39 PM

Oct 2019

Runner’s Lane

The purpose of the three-foot wide lane (aka 45’ lane) along the last half of the distance between home and first base in foul territory is widely misunderstood. It only applies when the ball is being thrown to first base from the area of the plate (roughly from behind the runner), and none of the three major baseball codes directly state that. Except where noted, the material applies equally to NFHS, NCAA and pro rules.

When the lane applies, the batter-runner is required to run the last half of the distance from home to first base within the three foot lane. If the runner does not do so, there is no penalty unless, in the umpire’s judgment, he interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base. Another misconception is the batter-runner is always out if he interferes with the throw itself. As we’ll see, that isn’t necessarily the case.

The lines are part of the lane, so stepping on the line is not a violation. Also, one foot in or on the line and the other foot in the air is permitted. The batter-runner must take two consecutive steps totally outside the lane to violate the rule. If interference is called, the ball is immediately dead and the batter-runner is out; any other runners return to the base occupied at the time of the pitch (NFHS 8-4-1g, NCAA 7-11p, OBR 5.09a11).

The throw does not have to strike the batter-runner for interference to be called but lacking such contact makes for a very contentious call. If the runner interferes with, obstructs, impedes, hinders or confuses the defensive player who is taking the throw at first base, it is interference.

https://baseballrulesacademy.com/rule-week-runners-lane/

The throw was more from roughly between the area of the mound and third base line than the plate, so rule doesn't apply.

Mersky

(5,268 posts)

19. Thank you

Reply to greyl (Reply #17)

Tue Oct 29, 2019, 11:13 PM

Oct 2019

That rule seems to be horseshit in practice. Are they supposed to have eyes on the backs of their heads? Am I missing something?

Grey, that is a helpful resource, and I’m still aggravated with the call. Gotta watch news now, decide what my schedule can possibly be tomorrow, as I finish this last beer, and sigh, just wish there hadn’t been the interruption. Oh well, to the best team that has the pale-jowled umps behind them? Ha. Huh. Ha.