Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Automobile Enthusiasts
Related: About this forumBest small block auto engine...Chevy 283 or Ford 289?
I favor the Chevy as I had a '57 Chevy Bel Air with a 283 ci back in the day.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
15 replies, 855 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Best small block auto engine...Chevy 283 or Ford 289? (Original Post)
brush
May 2024
OP
Agreed. And it's descendants, so to speak, are still available as 350 ci crate engines...
brush
May 2024
#2
My 65 Chevy had a 283, the lead sled, I was up in Maine, and it was down 3 quarts, great engine for a moron.
dem4decades
May 2024
#5
I beg to differ, the 65 Impala was okay, the 2 door, 67 Impala was beautiful. We had a marine blue one, with
dem4decades
May 2024
#8
Okay, but you could argue that both the 67 and 68 had triple taillights, only the 67's were classy; the 68's were stupid
dem4decades
May 2024
#10
Shellback Squid
(9,082 posts)1. 283, much easier to get parts
brush
(57,517 posts)2. Agreed. And it's descendants, so to speak, are still available as 350 ci crate engines...
that generate gobs of power.
Permanut
(6,639 posts)3. Had a '56 chev with a 265; similar to the 283. Loved it.
brush
(57,517 posts)4. The 265 was the first, then the 283, 327 and finally the 350.
all descendants of the 265.
I think there were bored out 283 variants... 301 and 302 came along in the early '00s...first by performance shops then by GM itself.
dem4decades
(11,913 posts)5. My 65 Chevy had a 283, the lead sled, I was up in Maine, and it was down 3 quarts, great engine for a moron.
Permanut
(6,639 posts)6. Just my two cents..
The' 65 was the last decent looking Chev.
I think that makes me old school.
brush
(57,517 posts)7. I remember them...the long, near fastback look.
I'm partial to the 3 tri-five Chevies myself.
dem4decades
(11,913 posts)8. I beg to differ, the 65 Impala was okay, the 2 door, 67 Impala was beautiful. We had a marine blue one, with
the long sweeping rear window, that was stunning. It also had a 283, if I had that and our 57 Impala, I'd be a happy camper.
Permanut
(6,639 posts)9. Roger that..
I was just missing the triple tail lights from '58 to '65.
dem4decades
(11,913 posts)10. Okay, but you could argue that both the 67 and 68 had triple taillights, only the 67's were classy; the 68's were stupid
Permanut
(6,639 posts)11. I'll give ya that; they went downhill from there.
dem4decades
(11,913 posts)12. Actually, I stopped paying attention after that. The 57 through 67 Impala's were the bomb. Okay, maybe not the 61.
Permanut
(6,639 posts)13. Same here..
but I had. 61 bubbletop I loved.
And let's not get started on what they did to the '68 Vette.
yourout
(8,071 posts)14. 327 Chevy with 4 barrel Holly... The mighty mouse.
Redleg
(6,142 posts)15. I liked the 283 in my Skylark
Had plently of get-up-and-go.