Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

white_wolf

(6,256 posts)
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 10:36 PM Jan 2012

Game of Thrones. I love the story, can't stand some of the characters. (spoilers for 1st 140 pages)

Has anyone else had this problem with this series. I'm only a 140 pages in and I really like it so far, but a lot of the characters come across as terrible people. I keep hoping half of them die. I like Bran, Jon Snow,Tyrion, and Arya. That is pretty much it, well except for Daenerys who I like and I find her husband's culture interesting.

All of the other characters come across as very selfish to me, which I suppose is the mark of a good author since that makes the more human, but I just don't like a lot of them. The way Jon's stepmother treated him when he came to say goodbye to Bran really annoyed me, oh and the crown prince just needs to die already, spoiled little brat. Anyway aside from these problems I'm really liking the book and was just curious to see if anyone else had this problem.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Game of Thrones. I love the story, can't stand some of the characters. (spoilers for 1st 140 pages) (Original Post) white_wolf Jan 2012 OP
Don't worry, a lot of them will die. Martin kills a lot of people. One death in particular had me iris27 Jan 2012 #1
Which one had you applauding? shawn703 May 2012 #20
I tried it too, also cannot stand the characters theAntiRand Jan 2012 #2
Well like I said I'm a fan of Bran and Edward Stark. white_wolf Jan 2012 #3
Tyrion kicks ass XemaSab Jan 2012 #6
Tyrion is also my favorite Onceuponalife Jan 2012 #12
A lot of the story arcs come full circle XemaSab Jan 2012 #4
I know exactly who you are bored with. white_wolf Apr 2012 #15
The person I was bored with isn't much in either of the last two books XemaSab Apr 2012 #16
I can't wait to get to it. I've missed Daenarys and Tyrion. white_wolf Apr 2012 #18
Don't worry, everybody dies. LeftyMom Jan 2012 #5
It is being turned into a video game. ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #7
To apologize for the characters caseymoz Jan 2012 #8
You are right about them being authentic. white_wolf Jan 2012 #9
Tolkien copied what was basically medieval propaganda caseymoz Jan 2012 #10
Feudal culture was more complicated than the black-on-black world displayed by Martin or Herbert. Leopolds Ghost Apr 2012 #17
We just have different terms. caseymoz Apr 2012 #19
I think a lot of what makes it so compelling and so horrifying is the authenticity XemaSab Jan 2012 #11
As you go through the series NewJeffCT Jan 2012 #13
Absolutely! FloridaJudy Apr 2012 #14
I LOVE Leigh Butler's blog summary and commentary on the series Matariki Jul 2012 #21
Spam deleted by LeftishBrit (MIR Team) kraj8995 Aug 2012 #22
I am fan of Kalisee Samanta Oct 2013 #23
welcome to DU gopiscrap Oct 2013 #24

iris27

(1,951 posts)
1. Don't worry, a lot of them will die. Martin kills a lot of people. One death in particular had me
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 02:38 AM
Jan 2012

applauding -- which is a little disturbing, now that I think about it! The really over-the-top ones, I think he writes them that way specifically for that effect. As for everyone else, he is trying (sometimes too hard) to include "shades of grey" since so much fantasy is stark black-and-white melodrama.

ETA: "Stark" pun not intended, whoops!

shawn703

(2,707 posts)
20. Which one had you applauding?
Fri May 25, 2012, 08:50 AM
May 2012

For me it wasn't someone really major. But he had it coming since the first book, and finally someone just had enough of him saying what he was and wasn't going to do.

That's about the only spoiler-free way I could think to write it, so I hope you can figure out who I mean.

 

theAntiRand

(40 posts)
2. I tried it too, also cannot stand the characters
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 05:22 PM
Jan 2012

I got about halfway through the second book and finally said "I'm just not enjoying this, why am I reading it?"

I love it when no character is safe from death, but only if I care about the characters, and I just can't bring myself to care about the cast of A Song of Ice and Fire. I can't stand ANY of them. I need someone to cheer for, and I couldn't find anyone worth cheering for due to the extreme gray-and gray world of Westeros.

white_wolf

(6,256 posts)
3. Well like I said I'm a fan of Bran and Edward Stark.
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 09:35 PM
Jan 2012

Jon Snow seems decent as does the dwarf, Tyltheion(sp?)

Onceuponalife

(2,614 posts)
12. Tyrion is also my favorite
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:15 AM
Jan 2012

followed by Arya. How can someone NOT like Arya?

And Peter Dinklage's performance of Tyrion makes it obvious to see why he won the Emmy and the Golden Globe.

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
4. A lot of the story arcs come full circle
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 06:36 PM
Jan 2012

There was one character that I *hated*. I hated this person, I hated this person's story, I didn't care, and I hoped this person would die horribly.

At the end of book three this person's story suddenly became compelling, and I've been bummed out that we haven't seen much of this person in the last two books.

There's really only one character in the whole series that I find myself totally bored with. All this person ever does is wander around looking for this one other person, and I'm just not there.

white_wolf

(6,256 posts)
15. I know exactly who you are bored with.
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 03:46 PM
Apr 2012

I'm halfway through Feast For Crows and I find myself skimming this person's chapters because they are so boring. On the upside on character that I hated in book one is slowly starting to grow on me. Damn, though there have been so many deaths of people I like. The one at the end of book 3 made me want to scream. I, do have one question. Where the hell is Daenerys? She's my favorite character and she hasn't shown up in the book yet, but there is a lot of foreshadowing about her. At least, Araya is in the book and still awesome.

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
16. The person I was bored with isn't much in either of the last two books
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 05:05 PM
Apr 2012

FFC and DWD was split, so FFC is all what's happening in the south whereas DWD follows Daenarys and what's going on in the north and east. DWD was a MUCH better book.

white_wolf

(6,256 posts)
18. I can't wait to get to it. I've missed Daenarys and Tyrion.
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 06:18 PM
Apr 2012

The only character I really like here in FFC is Araya and she's gotten maybe two chapters and a brief cameo in one of Sam's.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
7. It is being turned into a video game.
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 03:07 AM
Jan 2012


Apparently, it involves hammering a sword, seductively caressing a map, and traveling down the road with a group of people.

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
8. To apologize for the characters
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 03:52 AM
Jan 2012

I'm reading the very same series and I'm just a little further along than you are, or were when you posted.

I think the characters are extremely authentic to a feudalistic culture, more authentic than almost all fantasy I've seen, which means a lot of what they do are going to be offensive to post-modern sensibilities. The nobles act like nobles, which is to say they have a unshakeable sense of entitlement, that's just how they were raised. They are constantly thinking about who their enemies and friends are, and who they could trust, because it's a matter of life and death. Historically, people in those cultures are, overall, terribly almost desperately protective of their positions.

Such as Prince Joffrey catching the butcher's son doing something above rank. The Prince needed to enforce the class system that placed he himself at the top. I actually expected him to be much more cruel in that scene.

I happen to think that Eddard Stark is a very good person to raise Jon with the rest of his family. You have to see that to Caetlyn, Jon is not just an affront to her, but he represents a threat to her children's position and even their very survival, yet, it doesn't create a rift between her and Eddard. Their relationship is still quite loving. I'm anticipating that Caetlyn is going to end up changing her mind about Jon.

Meanwhile, Arya doesn't seem to be aware of class at all, and so I don't anticipate her faring too well. If anything, she's almost like a modern child dropped into a medieval culture, like putting a baby in the middle of a busy street.

I don't have much respect for Robert, but he's absolutely saintly compared to the rest of his family, with the possible exception of Tyrion.

It seems to me that Daenerys is going to turn into the real antagonist now that she has married into that barbarian tribe. I wonder how much longer she'll tolerate her brother now that she's the one who has power. I anticipate her character changing to something monstrous after Martin gave us reason to have sympathy for her.

Her husband, by the way, showed a surprising amount and depth and deference for her. So, now she has emotional support, and she, not her brother, has an army behind her and will be socialized into a ruthless culture. Her power-hungry, faithless brother has made a huge mistake. This should be interesting.

In other words, I think you should stick to it.

white_wolf

(6,256 posts)
9. You are right about them being authentic.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 06:05 PM
Jan 2012

Robert, or even Edward, is very different than say, Aragorn, who Tolkien portrays as the ideal king. Of course, Tolkien wasn't going for realism at all. He was trying to create myth and myths often have perfect kings.

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
10. Tolkien copied what was basically medieval propaganda
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:09 AM
Jan 2012

Actually, no, he copied people who copied medieval propaganda. The Throne series does not. It appears to take its cues from social history.

I guess the only other fantasy book I've seen that tries to be socially authentic about feudal cultures was "Dune." (I realize technically speaking it wasn't fantasy, but only technically speaking). By comparison, I had a hard time taking those characters, including the ones I should have been rooting for.

Leopolds Ghost

(12,875 posts)
17. Feudal culture was more complicated than the black-on-black world displayed by Martin or Herbert.
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 06:18 PM
Apr 2012

We have a lot of social history on the Middle Ages and the first thing we learn is that there's no such thing as the middle ages. If you want to look at the true dark times of the period you have to look back at the so-called Dark Ages, when the average life expectancy was similar to that of sub-saharan Africa... and even then the reason they're known as Dark Ages is because of missing records. The High Middle Ages were a period of relative prosperity, and the Black Death actually caused the end of feudalism due to the resulting labor shortages producing peasant rebellions and class levelling (the word "levelling" became a thing then). If you look at the bloodshed of warfare well that hasn't improved much. If you look at starvation and privation of the underclass, well, we just started exporting it elsewhere. Look at London's East End, where one researcher estimates that England actually killed off or deported much of its lower class to the colonies. Most present day Englishmen are biological descendants of the upper class, apparently. The lower classes did not survive the Industrial Revolution.

Tolkien was indeed going for myth, the societies in his books are all directly influenced by divine creatures and magical forces. Tolkien actually wrote a lot of background dissertations on where he felt Middle Earth fit in with his politics which were basically culturally conservative, anti-corporate, libertarian. He felt the best government was none at all.

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
19. We just have different terms.
Tue Apr 10, 2012, 02:41 AM
Apr 2012

Last edited Tue Apr 10, 2012, 10:44 PM - Edit history (1)

To be perfectly accurate, people living in both the Middle and Dark Ages used the term "Middle age" as the name of their times, for a completely different reason than we do. It referred to the times between Christ's Ascension and the Second Coming. So, I use the terms interchangeably even though I know there's a huge difference between the High Middle Ages and the Dark Ages, but the latter was the beginnings of the feudal system that reached fruition in the former.

You have to expect a fiction writer to simplify the system for the modern reader, who is not going to earn a degree just for the honor of reading a writer's fiction. For one thing, if you think lawyers have made everything complicated today, law was just complicated in the Middle Ages, and required plenty of lawyers.

The main social difference between then and now is the concept of individual rights and liberties. People in those systems from top to bottom were born into a network of social obligations, vassal to lord, lord to vassal, lord to king, and vice-versa. The society was made of a network of these, and it would take a Pope to release somebody from them, and it did take a Pope in the case of Leonardo da Vinci.

I'm skeptical that the people in England are all descended from the upper classes. For one thing, genealogists would have been able to determine this long ago, and it would now be common knowledge, impossible to miss. For another, surnames like "Miller," "Baker" and "Smith" would be extinct in England if that were true. You should look at compelling, novel observations critically.

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
11. I think a lot of what makes it so compelling and so horrifying is the authenticity
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:11 PM
Jan 2012

It's a culture where peasants, women, and children are NOTHING, and as I said upthread, the plot is driven by people who have nothing trying to get a piece of something.

FloridaJudy

(9,465 posts)
14. Absolutely!
Sun Apr 8, 2012, 03:11 AM
Apr 2012

One character I started out hating turned out to have some decent qualities. Another that I absolutely loathed wound up being merely pathetic.

And even the "good" characters have some interesting flaws.

I must admit I did cheer at least two of the deaths in series. Westeros is a better place now that they're gone.

Two others were [font size=30]N[font size=20]O[font size=10]Oo[font size=5]ooooooo!

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
21. I LOVE Leigh Butler's blog summary and commentary on the series
Wed Jul 11, 2012, 08:08 PM
Jul 2012

She's very funny and it's entertaining to read her tearing into your favorite 'love to hate' characters. Highly recommend it...

http://www.tor.com/blogs/2011/03/a-read-of-ice-and-fire-a-game-of-thrones-part-1

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Fantasy Literature»Game of Thrones. I love ...