Scholars reassess Hamlet following one-star Amazon review
The world’s foremost literary and theatre critics say they have been forced into reconsidering the merit of William Shakespeare’s epic five-hour play Hamlet, following a scathing critique by an anonymous purchaser on Amazon.co.uk.
Kingofxbox lays into Shakespeare’s longest and most frequently-staged work in the books section of the online shopping site: ‘What is this sh*t? Dont get me wrong, I like theater (Cats, We will rock you, etc) but this just go’s on and on until you dont care less what happens. To be or not to be? Couldnt give a flying one, mate!’
Mr Box continues: ‘With a nunnery scene and poisoning and stuff it could have been brilliant. But as olde englishee shakefpeare would say – Hamlettee fuckf aff.’
The posting has forced an instant reassessment of Hamlet by leading scholars and critics. ‘Shakespeare intended to write his plays for the common man, not just speccy ponces at universities,’ remarked reviewer Battlefield3fan (aka Jonathan Bate, Professor of Renaissance Literature, University of Warwick). ‘So why does Hamlet signally fail to connect with Kingofxbox? For this reason at least, it should be struck from the Shakespearean canon forthwith.’
http://www.newsbiscuit.com/2012/03/11/scholars-reassess-hamlet-following-one-star-amazon-review/
= new reply since forum marked as read
was this line : Battlefield3fan (aka Jonathan Bate, Professor of Renaissance Literature, University of Warwick). 
