Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
"Mr. Trump would not even need to formally quit the alliance to render it pointless."
Foreseeing the possibility of an American retreat from the world if Mr. Trump returns to office, Congress recently passed legislation barring any president from withdrawing from the NATO treaty without Senate approval. But Mr. Trump would not even need to formally quit the alliance to render it pointless.
And if the United States could not be counted on to come to the aid of partners in Europe, where it has the strongest historic ties, then other countries with mutual security agreements with Washington like Japan, the Philippines, Thailand, Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Panama could hardly be sure of American help, either.
Peter D. Feaver, a Duke University professor and former national security aide to Mr. Bush and President Bill Clinton, said Mr. Trump could reduce American troops in Europe to a level that would render any military defense plans hollow and regularly poor-mouth the U.S. commitment in a way that would convince Mr. Putin that he had free rein.
Just doing those two things could wound and perhaps kill NATO, Mr. Feaver said. And few allies or partners in other parts of the world would trust any U.S. commitment after seeing us break NATO.
And if the United States could not be counted on to come to the aid of partners in Europe, where it has the strongest historic ties, then other countries with mutual security agreements with Washington like Japan, the Philippines, Thailand, Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Panama could hardly be sure of American help, either.
Peter D. Feaver, a Duke University professor and former national security aide to Mr. Bush and President Bill Clinton, said Mr. Trump could reduce American troops in Europe to a level that would render any military defense plans hollow and regularly poor-mouth the U.S. commitment in a way that would convince Mr. Putin that he had free rein.
Just doing those two things could wound and perhaps kill NATO, Mr. Feaver said. And few allies or partners in other parts of the world would trust any U.S. commitment after seeing us break NATO.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/11/us/politics/trump-nato.html?unlocked_article_code=1.U00.V9UK._Ta7pwb0mxJH&smid=url-share
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1554 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Mr. Trump would not even need to formally quit the alliance to render it pointless." (Original Post)
BootinUp
Feb 2024
OP
no_hypocrisy
(48,936 posts)1. Plus, imagine if Russia did invade a NATO country, I doubt that
a republican-led House would declare war. Even though Presidents have inserted the US into war without Congress, with a Trump in the WH and a republican House, does it matter if we're still in NATO?
Irish_Dem
(58,291 posts)2. Putin's dream is to break up the US, Europe and NATO.
He has been very successful working on this goal.
LetMyPeopleVote
(154,840 posts)3. Congress has prohibited TFG from removing the US from NATO
BootinUp
(49,113 posts)4. This was mentioned in OP and
The article suggests it would be ineffective at stopping a breakdown of the security apparatus. I am not saying its right but it could be imho.