Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(117,050 posts)
Mon Oct 19, 2020, 07:25 PM Oct 2020

Pentagon estimates cost of new nuclear missiles at $95.8B

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Pentagon has raised to $95.8 billion the estimated cost of fielding a new fleet of land-based nuclear missiles to replace the Minuteman 3 arsenal that has operated continuously for 50 years, officials said Monday.

The estimate is up about $10 billion from four years ago.

The weapons, known as intercontinental ballistic missiles, or ICBMs, are intended as part of a near-total replacement of the American nuclear force over the next few decades at a total cost of more than $1.2 trillion.

Some, including former Defense Secretary William J. Perry, argue that U.S. national security can be ensured without ICBMs, but the Pentagon says they are vital to deterring war. The Trump administration affirmed its commitment to fielding a new generation of ICBMs in a 2018 review of nuclear policy.

"The ICBM force is highly survivable against any but a large-scale nuclear attack,” the review concluded. “To destroy U.S. ICBMs on the ground, an adversary would need to launch a precisely coordinated attack with hundreds of high-yield and accurate warheads. This is an insurmountable challenge for any potential adversary today, with the exception of Russia.”

Read more: https://www.chron.com/news/article/Pentagon-estimates-cost-of-new-nuclear-missiles-15659039.php

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pentagon estimates cost of new nuclear missiles at $95.8B (Original Post) TexasTowelie Oct 2020 OP
Or you could keep everyone alive. C_U_L8R Oct 2020 #1
Any good against a biological/chemical attack? Or against internal enemies of democracy? erronis Oct 2020 #2

erronis

(16,909 posts)
2. Any good against a biological/chemical attack? Or against internal enemies of democracy?
Mon Oct 19, 2020, 07:55 PM
Oct 2020

How would a new ICBM take out home-based terrorists?

Or against a [supposed] president that turns rogue?

Big missiles that inflict incredible collateral damage are not a way of winning the long-term objectives. Unless those objectives are global annihilation.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Pentagon estimates cost o...