Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Trump is determined to bring home U.S. military forces from somewhere
Source: Washington Post
Trump is determined to bring home U.S. military forces from somewhere
By Karen DeYoung and Missy Ryan
7/21/2020, 7:00:00 a.m.
When President Trump spoke with Pentagon leaders early last month about U.S. troop levels in Afghanistan, he was anxious for a hefty reduction by Election Day in November, according to U.S. officials familiar with the discussion.
Reminded that withdrawals below the current level of approximately 8,600 about the same as when Trump first took office were contingent upon still-unmet conditions outlined in the U.S.-Taliban deal signed early this year, he questioned whether U.S. forces in Syria could be decreased.
Not advisable, Trump was told of the approximately 800 troops there, most still engaged in fighting the Islamic State and keeping Russia, Iran and Turkey from expanding their reach.
-snip-
Since taking office, Trump has been struggling to fulfill his 2016 campaign pledge to significantly reduce the nearly 200,000 American military personnel then overseas, already the smallest number in many decades. In countries such as Afghanistan, U.S. troops are merely serving as police, he has argued, while Germany, South Korea and others that could afford to defend themselves are getting U.S. protection on the cheap at taxpayer expense.
But Trump has been stymied at virtually every turn. While there have been some relatively minor shifts in distribution and since 2017 the Defense Department no longer includes troops in Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq in its unclassified, published tallies the overall total of those serving abroad is believed to have slightly increased since Barack Obama left office.
-snip-
By Karen DeYoung and Missy Ryan
7/21/2020, 7:00:00 a.m.
When President Trump spoke with Pentagon leaders early last month about U.S. troop levels in Afghanistan, he was anxious for a hefty reduction by Election Day in November, according to U.S. officials familiar with the discussion.
Reminded that withdrawals below the current level of approximately 8,600 about the same as when Trump first took office were contingent upon still-unmet conditions outlined in the U.S.-Taliban deal signed early this year, he questioned whether U.S. forces in Syria could be decreased.
Not advisable, Trump was told of the approximately 800 troops there, most still engaged in fighting the Islamic State and keeping Russia, Iran and Turkey from expanding their reach.
-snip-
Since taking office, Trump has been struggling to fulfill his 2016 campaign pledge to significantly reduce the nearly 200,000 American military personnel then overseas, already the smallest number in many decades. In countries such as Afghanistan, U.S. troops are merely serving as police, he has argued, while Germany, South Korea and others that could afford to defend themselves are getting U.S. protection on the cheap at taxpayer expense.
But Trump has been stymied at virtually every turn. While there have been some relatively minor shifts in distribution and since 2017 the Defense Department no longer includes troops in Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq in its unclassified, published tallies the overall total of those serving abroad is believed to have slightly increased since Barack Obama left office.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-is-determined-to-bring-home-us-military-forces-from-somewhere/2020/07/20/c2664fb8-c851-11ea-b037-f9711f89ee46_story.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1315 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump is determined to bring home U.S. military forces from somewhere (Original Post)
Eugene
Jul 2020
OP
Bev54
(11,917 posts)1. He can bring them home from Portland Oregon
fleur-de-lisa
(14,664 posts)2. From wherever Putin tells him to bring them.
Everything he does is for the benfit of Russia.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)3. Well, that's 200,000 more troops he can use against "domestic terrorists"
Like... everybody not his base.
soryang
(3,306 posts)4. the troops removed from Germany aren't likely to "come home"
the tentative plans are to send them to Latvia and Poland. I think the way to avoid charges of hypocrisy is for DOD to claim well we will be using an operational rotation of troops. This costs much more. But apparently money is no object with this Congress.