Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(120,272 posts)
Fri Nov 10, 2023, 02:44 PM Nov 2023

Allowing Domestic Violence Perpetrators to Carry Guns Will Worsen the U.S. Maternal Health Crisis

(and the WAR ON WOMEN continues apace)

Allowing Domestic Violence Perpetrators to Carry Guns Will Worsen the U.S. Maternal Health Crisis
11/5/2023 by Tamar Eisen

Editor’s note: On Tuesday, Nov. 7, at 9:15 a.m. ET, gun safety and domestic violence prevention advocates will rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of oral arguments in United States v. Rahimi. Oral arguments will begin at 10 a.m.
The right to life and reproductive autonomy includes the right to live free from violence at the hands of intimate partners.


Hundreds march in a rally in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade on July 2, 2022, in Long Beach, Calif. (Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in United States v. Rahimi, a case in which the Court will decide whether the Second Amendment prevents the government from protecting survivors of domestic violence by temporarily disarming their abusers. Invalidating this law would exacerbate an already colossal maternal and reproductive health and rights crisis in the United States and have devastating consequences—as the Center for Reproductive Rights (where I work) argued in an amicus brief to the Court.

Violence against women is a pervasive problem globally, but in the U.S., the lethal combination of intimate partner violence (IPV) against women and guns is staggering. Eighty percent of intimate partner firearm homicide victims are women. And pregnancy can further increase the risk of IPV and intensify violence already experienced in abusive relationships—especially when it comes to guns. Between 2008-2019, 68 percent of pregnancy-related homicides involved firearms—a number that rose to 81 percent in 2020. The intersection of IPV, gun violence and pregnancy is an issue of both gender and racial justice. People of color, and others whose communities have been subject to decades of discrimination and structural disadvantage, disproportionately experience the harms of IPV and gun violence. The threat of homicide for Black women who are pregnant is more than eight times higher than for all Black women. In 2020, 55 percent of pregnant homicide victims were Black.

IPV also threatens the lives of people who do not want to be pregnant. Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, the National Domestic Violence Hotline has seen a 100 percent increase in calls about reproductive coercion. This is a form of domestic violence in which abusers attempt to control their partner’s reproductive agency. Guns make reproductive coercion lethal—a fatal reality witnessed this year when Texan Gabriella Gonzalez was murdered by her boyfriend because she got an abortion. In short, for those at risk of IPV and gun violence, it is even more deadly to be pregnant at a time when a national maternal and reproductive health crisis is already threatening the lives of millions of people during pregnancy and postpartum.
. . . . . .

To the extent U.S. history has been one of exclusion and discrimination, it requires judicial rectification, not replication. If the Court accepts the extremist view that the Second Amendment prevents government from protecting the constitutional rights of women and pregnant people subject to IPV and gun violence, it will compound real world harms for this population—as evidenced by homicide statistics for pregnant people and the public health emergency that resulted from the Dobbs decision. The right to life and reproductive autonomy includes the right to live free from violence at the hands of intimate partners. Remedying the maternal health crisis and protecting the reproductive rights of all people requires systemic change on many fronts. Prevention of IPV and gun violence is one essential way to address this deadly intersection. The Supreme Court must refuse to perpetuate this discriminatory originalist approach.

https://msmagazine.com/2023/11/05/domestic-violence-guns-pregnant-women-dobbs-maternal-health/

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Allowing Domestic Violenc...