Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Saviolo

(3,321 posts)
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 09:58 AM Jan 2018

New Jersey bans Bump Stocks

N.J. bans gun device used in Las Vegas shooting after Christie signs bill

http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2018/01/nj_bans_gun_device_used_in_las_vegas_shooting_afte.html

It's now illegal in New Jersey to sell or posses a "bump stock," the controversial firearm accessory allegedly used by the gunman in last year's Las Vegas massacre.

Gov. Chris Christie, a Republican set to leave office Tuesday, signed a Democratic-sponsored bill Monday outlawing the devices, which can be affixed to semiautomatic riffles to allow them to fire bullets, mimicking automatic weapons.

Christie -- who took action on more than 150 bills on his final full day in office -- made no statement on the legislation (S3477/A5200), which takes effect immediately.

Anyone who owns a bump stock or "trigger crank" now has 90 days -- until April 15 -- to surrender the accessories to law enforcement authorities. Retailers who sell them have 30 days.

Sale or possession of a bump stock is now a third-degree crime that carries a sentence of three-to-five years in prison, a fine of up to $15,000, or both.


Good for NJ!
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Jersey bans Bump Stocks (Original Post) Saviolo Jan 2018 OP
You would think its a no-brainer HopeAgain Jan 2018 #1
One small step for some Guns, one giant leap in vile NRA land. The outrage will be childish. Fred Sanders Jan 2018 #2
So how much are they being paid for thier property? oneshooter Jan 2018 #3
I was thinking Article 1 Section 9 Lokilooney Jan 2018 #5
Yeah Gothmog Jan 2018 #4
No, that's BS. If a person damages someone HeartachesNhangovers Jan 2018 #6
6. No, that's BS. If a person damages someone
Tue Jan 16, 2018, 09:41 PM
Jan 2018

else's property or hurts or kills someone else, then go ahead and use existing laws to charge them criminally or file a civil suit. But if somebody wants to waste a bunch of ammo pretending they've got a machine gun and aren't hurting anyone else, then I don't care and the government shouldn't either.

It's not like there aren't any real problems to work on: crumbling public infrastructure, environmental degradation, too many poorly-performing schools, people dropping dead of fentanyl overdoses, etc, etc, etc.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»New Jersey bans Bump Stoc...