Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumJoe Holcombe, 86, mourning the loss of the generations he had raised.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/06/us/shooting-victims-texas.htmlThe next, eight of them were gone.
Bryan and Karla Holcombe, a guest preacher and his wife, were dead.
Their son Marc Daniel Holcombe, gone. Their pregnant daughter-in-law, Crystal Holcombe, gone.
And four of their grandchildren Noah, Emily, Megan and Greg gone.
----------------------------
America needs to ban all guns that are not single-shot hunting rifles. Handgun ban. Assault rifle ban. Semiautomatic ban.
Single-shot hunting rifles only. Have as many as you want. But not other guns. We support hunters. Not people who want to kill other people. And if you own a whole lot of non-hunting guns, or you are anti-gun control -- you are part of the problem.
Sneederbunk
(15,106 posts)Phoenix61
(17,642 posts)When are we going to get it? Enough already. Fuck the second amendment.
bdtrppr6
(796 posts)FREEDUMB!
TupperHappy
(166 posts)Never do I hear one word from the gun banners about the predictable negative consequences of their "commonsense, reasonable" gun bans.
The CDC put out a gun research report in 2013. Among the findings was that there are at least 500 thousand self-defense uses of a firearm every year, compared with about 300 thousand criminal uses.
500,000, at least, and could be higher.
Tell me, how many of those 500,000 are you willing to see robbed and beaten and raped and murdered in order to get your "reasonable, commonsense " gun bans? How many gallons of blood are you willing to live with, so long as we get rid of the icky guns? What level of fascist police state will you tolerate in order to get rid of those guns? Cause let's face it, the only way a ban will ever be "effective" is if it's coupled with confiscation. Door to door searches, say good bye to the 4th amendment along with the 2nd. After all, you can't make an omelet without breaking a few heads, right?
yagotme
(3,816 posts)but the guy across the street shot the bad guy with an AR-15, stopping any further action by him.
american_ideals
(613 posts)yagotme
(3,816 posts)letting him go shoot up another church, or whatever???
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)...possibly beacuse it reminds them that fine words and good thoughts don't actually do anything against
those bent on harming others
american_ideals
(613 posts)And it's been shown worldwide. You have more handguns and semiauto rifles, more people die.
Pretty simple. The idea that more guns allows NRA-types to stop shootings is bunk. Yes, they can stop shootings, but only after a bunch of people already are killed.
Best way to stop gun crime: remove guns. Keep single-shot hunting rifles, ban all other guns.
yagotme
(3,816 posts)Are you also going to remove NK's, Russia's China's, etc. guns? I'll grab a popcorn and a Dr Pepper while you work on that one. After all, Chicago's excuse for violent crime/shootings is Indiana, so if the USA bans guns, I'll guess the criminals will just import them from other areas. See: The War On Drugs.
Straw Man
(6,771 posts)What do you mean by "keep" them? Every hunting rifle that I know of is a repeater, whether lever, bolt, or semi-auto action. Are you referring to muzzle-loaders? They are hardly the typical "hunting rifle," although people do hunt with them.
yagotme
(3,816 posts)Straw Man
(6,771 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 27, 2017, 12:51 AM - Edit history (1)
I know the theory of "make the shot count," but it's better to have a follow-up shot and not need it than to need it and not have it. Wounded game running off to die slowly isn't exactly sporting.
I think the post I was responding to used the word "keep" to give the impression that hunters wouldn't be subject to any sort of confiscation of guns they already own. Nothing could be further from the truth. Trying to ban all repeaters would guarantee immediate pushback from even the Fuddiest of Fudds.
yagotme
(3,816 posts)I'm guessing he/she doesn't have the full idea of exactly what's out there, and being used, or the actual #'s of arms being considered for "his/her" ban. Here in IL, some hunters use the single shot rifled 12 gauge. Don't know how many, but I am intellectually honest enough to admit that.
Straw Man
(6,771 posts)Most hunters I know who are using a rifled 12-gauge are using a pump. I've worked sight-in days before deer season at my local gun club for the past 10 years, and I can't recall seeing any single-shot shotguns.
yagotme
(3,816 posts)beginning hunter, got shotgun, scope, sling, used, for $150.00. Used that for a couple of years until traded for an 870. Not saying it happens a lot, but it does occasionally.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)Made to fit your Rem.870. Mossberg, Auto5, or most other shotguns. There are also rifled 12ga. replacement barrels for most single shots.
yagotme
(3,816 posts)I have an aftermarket for my 870, but I have zeroing problems. I got one with rifle sights, and mounted a scope on the receiver. Unfortunately, there is enough play in the receiver/barrel connection, that after 3-5 rounds, the barrel may shift slightly, and then the scope is no longer looking where the barrel is pointed. Should have gotten the cantilever mount, that should work a lot better. Started hunting with a Ruger 8 3/8" .44, 100 yard zero. 3 down with it so far.