NRA restores Romrell endorsement after magazine comments

[SecularMotion]

The National Rifle Association’s political arm restored its endorsement of Rep. Paul Romrell, R-St. Anthony. A spokeswoman said the group stands firmly behind the legislator.

Amy Hunter, regional spokeswoman for the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund said the group had “suspended” Romrell’s endorsement for two days while it reviewed comments the two-term lawmaker made about high-capacity magazines.

In a late-April interview with IdahoReporter.com, Romrell clarified his stance. He said the high-capacity magazines give him “heartburn” and wondered why gun-owners might want to own them.

“Sportsmen don’t need 200-round magazines,” Romrell told IdahoReporter.com. “Someone who wants to kill a lot of people could ask for a large magazine.”

http://idahoreporter.com/38717/nra-restores-romrell-endorsement-magazine-comments/

[pablo_marmol]

1. SM -- if you truly cared about the victims of gun violence you'd call out Kamala Harris

http://213ajq29v6vk19b76q3534cx.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Special-Feature-K-Harris.pdf

[Eleanors38]

2. Jeez, how long has Kamala had to deal with this massive incompetency?

My cat couldn't make a worse mess with a dozen toilet paper rollers.

[SecularMotion]

3. This was authored by a lobbyist for the NRA

Mr. Michel represents many of the most prominent shooting sports and self-defense civil rights associations in the world, including the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA), and has represented many different clients in high profile cases that garnered significant media attention. He is a regular commentator and frequent contributor to national media discussions, and has appeared as a spokesperson for the NRA, CRPA, other associations, and individual clients on dozens of video and radio interviews and in hundreds of newspaper articles.

[beevul]

5. And that is all you can say.

Last edited Tue May 10, 2016, 06:15 PM - Edit history (1)

You can not say that the information at the link is incorrect, or you would have.

Instead, you did what you did, which makes it a confirmation of sorts.

[friendly_iconoclast]

6. Do you dispute its accuracy? By all means, point out the errors within it.

[pablo_marmol]

7. Genetic fallacy = SecMo FAIL. NT

[ileus]

4. 30 rounders are most reliable, all others are range junk toys.