Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumBackground checks on gun sales more popular than Taylor Swift
Last edited Sun Feb 7, 2016, 06:12 PM - Edit history (1)
Theyre three of Americas favorite things, according to a new Funny or Die video sponsored by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.
Calling for background checks on every single gun sale are actors Amanda Peet and Dennis Quaid, the latest in Hollywood to lend their clout to the gun control cause.
"Football, Taylor Swift, and dogs are some of the most popular things in this country," Quaid says.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/americans-gun-sale-background-checks-video-article-1.2519112
[center][/center]
Response to SecularMotion (Original post)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)You know, there are pro-RKBA celebrities as well. Somehow I doubt their celebrity status would mean much for you.
Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #3)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)in the dead of night with no debate?
Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #5)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)but accuse others of being cultists.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,577 posts)...the in the adventure of a vacation, getting there is half or more of experience. From the answers I read, I infer your respondent views passing laws and destroying the NRA as goals. Articulating neither the issue of homicides nor suicides nor accidental death is rather telling.
I submit that many pro-control folks are simply interested in finding an enemy and opposing anything the enemy favors.
Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #7)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)you have no intention engaging with us.
We're quite happy to debate. One of the things that have endeared me to the RKBA advocates is their ready willingness to discuss studies, case law and other points of fact.
You, low post count and all, seem to think you're the first to ever come here, challenge us and then -- grow so frustrated with us not accepting your first words -- retreat to insults. You're not bringing anything new. In fact, it is the exact same banal routine that attends pretty much every Controller who ventures in here.
You can make as many pronouncements as you like about being in the majority but your side has achieved an "assault weapon" registration law that is largely ignored, the NY SAFE Act passed in the dead of night without debate (speaking of the cultist epithet) that is also primarily ignored, a magazine capacity limit in Colorado that lost the state legislature to the GOP, an executive action to cancel reciprocity that resulted in a retreat less the legislature pass by veto-proof margins Constitutional-carry laws and an AWB that the 4th Circuit said is subject to strict scrutiny.
By the way, the NRA isn't the only RKBA organization. Is it just the NRA you have a problem with or is it also the 1A that you find so nettlesome?
beevul
(12,194 posts)Until you show them your view of "reasonable", then the support you speak of evaporates. Maybe it was just a mirage.
Ahh, the politics of misrepresentation and projection. We do not see a conflict between our rights and the interests and safety of the public. The only people that see that, are people like you. You're misrepresenting our position, projecting yours on to us. And you got caught. Tut tut...
If we strip away the hyperbole here, we're left with the 'howitzer' comment. Guess what genius: We DO let people own their own howitzers, and tanks, and RPGs. You haven't the foggiest idea of what the facts even are. Its a shame you bothered to preach without them, but then, cultists do that. Are you projecting again too?
Bzzt. Wrong again.
Spoken as if theres a sizable number of people, not to mention posters on DU, who actually believe in no restrictions. Strawman much?
Oh this is rich, Oh so rich.
If we are the ones uninterested in debate, why is it always people on your side of the argument running away:
You are aware of who authored that projectionist screed right before running away, I trust?
We have an anti-gun poster here who posts google dumps in multiples daily, who is the host of the anti-gun group, who essentially never debates anything. Like I said, its basically always the anti-gun types that run away. I'll find you 20 examples of anti-gun posters running from the argument for every one you can find of a pro-gun poster doing the same. So yeah, another misrepresentation.
And "compromise"? Please. We know how anti-gun folks feel about compromise. Just because your head is buried in the sand, doesn't mean everyone elses is. Here we go, an example of how anti-gunners actually feel about real compromise:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172186338
I noticed your absence in that thread. Pop on over and leave a comment, wont you? I'm game to discuss it. I won't run away. Are you? Will you?
As to the validity of the points of the perceived opposition, when I see some validity, I'll point it out. So far I haven't seen much of any. Penis jokes and the accusation of "nra talking points" don't constitute validity, just so you're aware.
Spoken like a true lifelong hunter and gun owner.
sarisataka
(20,998 posts)Will comment on Bloomie the antigun hero and his continuing attacks on Democrats. Usually our control proponents ignore these inconvenient facts. Maybe this poster will be brave enough to comment. I'll wait
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Artillery, and RPG'S can legally be owned in the usa6
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)On Sun Feb 7, 2016, 10:51 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Run away, run away, that's what you you best when confronted by facts. LOL.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=186511
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This member is a serial harasser who rarely posts content. Please hide this personal attack
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Feb 7, 2016, 11:01 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Tell us why you want the message hidden, not why you want the member disappeared.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Not only a personal call-out, it does not even try to address the post it follows.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Obnoxious, but not hide worthy
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)I guess some can't handle the truth and just want to disappear those who don't walk in lockstep.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Drive by insults work well
DonP
(6,185 posts)And gun control never seems to be able to get all your imaginary friends that support your thinking to the polls to vote in gun control legislators.
But, gun control supporters as a group have proven to be notably cheap and lazy out in the real world where only votes matter.
So you keep faith with your "Stack-O-Polls" and we'll go with the actual votes.
(Cue the pathetic; "But the NRA buys all the legislatures" excuse for two decades of failure.)
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Open carry has been legal in most states forever without any issues.
ileus
(15,396 posts)The tide will turn soon.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Do tell