Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 06:38 AM Jan 2016

California Moves to Expand Definition of Assault Weapons Covered Under Ban

In 1989, disturbed drifter and local resident Patrick Purdy opened fire at Cleveland Elementary School in Stockton, Calif., killing five children and injuring at least 30 others before committing suicide. In the aftermath, attention focused on the weapon he used – a semiautomatic rifle that fired 106 rounds in three minutes. Later that year, the California legislature passed the state’s first assault weapons ban which made it illegal to own or transfer more than 50 brands of semiautomatic rifles, as well as certain pistols and shotguns. The Roberti-Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989 would be amended again in 1999 to restrict access to magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition.

The federal government would follow suit in 1994 with its own version of an assault weapons ban, but after it expired in 2004 several attempts to renew the ban have been unsuccessful. The number of mass shootings have continued and have become even deadlier as federal restrictions have sunset due to weapons that can hold more ammunition and fire more rounds in a shorter period of time. Even in states like California that still have bans, technology has made it easier to alter firearms that can be turned into a semiautomatic weapon that falls under the ban.

By definition, a semiautomatic firearm is one that can shoot one bullet (or cartridge) with each pull of a trigger. While the definition of assault weapon varies depending on jurisdiction, a generally accepted definition is a “semiautomatic firearm with a large magazine of ammunition that is designed and configured for rapid fire and combat use.” Many gun owners balk at the idea of calling these assault weapons and limiting the term to military style automatic weapons capable of firing several rounds with each trigger pull. However, a semiautomatic rifle with a large ammunition magazine still allows for the shooter to fire hundreds of rounds in minutes. This is why several states have limited the sale of ammunition magazines to those that can hold no more than ten rounds.

http://www.care2.com/causes/california-moves-to-expand-definition-of-assault-weapons-covered-under-ban.html
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California Moves to Expand Definition of Assault Weapons Covered Under Ban (Original Post) SecularMotion Jan 2016 OP
nobody is coming for your guns Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #1
Yup, "Nobody is coming for your deer rifle" DonP Jan 2016 #6
lol Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #7
Essentially this new bill will make... Puha Ekapi Jan 2016 #2
I don't see this as making much difference to gun owners TeddyR Jan 2016 #3
It will make a huge difference to gun owners... Puha Ekapi Jan 2016 #4
IMHO, that pen stroke... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #8
Thats the math out friends don't seem to understand. beevul Jan 2016 #9
The citizens of CA should tell their 1%er "leaders" to FO. ileus Jan 2016 #5
 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
6. Yup, "Nobody is coming for your deer rifle"
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 10:39 AM
Jan 2016

First we'll reclassify it as a deadly "sniper rifle", then we'll come for it.

Puha Ekapi

(594 posts)
2. Essentially this new bill will make...
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 09:14 AM
Jan 2016

..virtually all semi-automatic rifles illegal. The public is not in favor of it, and you can expect massive non-compliance if Governor Brown even signs it, which is highly doubtful.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
3. I don't see this as making much difference to gun owners
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 09:36 AM
Jan 2016

And is pointless in any event - semi-automatic rifles are rarely used in crimes (and automatic weapons essentially never used in crimes). Of course California, with its already strict gun laws, falls near the national average in gun murders, while someplace like Vermont, with very liberal gun laws, has very few murders. "Gunz" aren't the problem, but it is easier to blame an inanimate object than ask and answer difficult questions about the real causes of gun violence in this country.

Puha Ekapi

(594 posts)
4. It will make a huge difference to gun owners...
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 10:07 AM
Jan 2016

...by essentially outlawing the most common rifles in use, and creating a new group of criminals with a stroke of the pen.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,577 posts)
8. IMHO, that pen stroke...
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 12:37 PM
Jan 2016

...should be viewed, the same as a pen writing a bad check, as a criminal act, a constitutional fraud and a violation of the oath of office.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
9. Thats the math out friends don't seem to understand.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 03:41 PM
Jan 2016

Is it worth pissing off millions of voters, to add another layer of law which the criminal will simply ignore?

Its a net loss. Every time.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
5. The citizens of CA should tell their 1%er "leaders" to FO.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 10:28 AM
Jan 2016

Every law that's been passed against the will of the people should be tossed out....every one.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»California Moves to Expan...