Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 05:38 AM Jan 2016

Gun policy puts public safety first

Lowell Police Superintendent William Taylor and opponents of his updated firearms policy exchanged heated words for the third time before the City Council on Tuesday night.

And for the third time, they couldn't agree, even though both sides have met more than once to resolve their differences outside of Council chambers. However, since police chiefs in this state possess the authority to set firearms-license regulations, their decisions stand.

Gun proponents in attendance still disagreed with every new provision, including one that requires that everyone seeking a license take a gun-safety course with a live-fire component.

Cost would seem to be the main sticking point. Randy Breton, a trained firearms-safety instructor, said this expense would discourage people from applying even for a restricted gun permit, citing a five-day course costing $1,100.

http://www.lowellsun.com/opinion/ci_29413403/gun-policy-puts-public-safety-first
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gun policy puts public safety first (Original Post) SecularMotion Jan 2016 OP
$1100 for a 5 day course? JonathanRackham Jan 2016 #1
Good news Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #2
Well, thank goodness ... JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2016 #3
Sounds like a need for more informed voters. beardown Jan 2016 #4
"it must be affordable." Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #5
It cost me $215 to get my concealed carry permit here in Texas. $130 for the non-refundable Waldorf Jan 2016 #8
Hundreds of dollars to be law-abiding. Ridiculous. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #9
In OK Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #10
Sounds like Southern-style Subterfuge in action; a "common sense" action... Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #6
If they were doing it about voting they'd all have their torches and pitchforks in hand DonP Jan 2016 #7

beardown

(363 posts)
4. Sounds like a need for more informed voters.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 11:37 AM
Jan 2016

City council needs to pass a regulation that anyone who wants to vote needs to attend a five day civics and government course which runs about $1,200 and is only offered 8-5 during the week and at one location way up by the gated community which is 2 miles from the closest bus stop.

I'm actually for much higher gun training requirements, but the caveat is that it must be affordable. Even to the point of the State providing funding for anyone who needs help paying for it. The State has an interest in assisting in a well regulated militia as do citizens having safer and better trained gun owners.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
5. "it must be affordable."
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 12:38 PM
Jan 2016

Concealed carry permits cost more than $150.00 where I live so my husband open carries when he carries.

Waldorf

(654 posts)
8. It cost me $215 to get my concealed carry permit here in Texas. $130 for the non-refundable
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 09:16 PM
Jan 2016

form to the State for the background check. $10 for the fingerprinting and $75 for the one day class.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
10. In OK
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 10:30 PM
Jan 2016

$25 for the sheriff, $30 for the class and $200 for a 10 year license, could have opted for a 5 year at $100

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
6. Sounds like Southern-style Subterfuge in action; a "common sense" action...
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 02:32 PM
Jan 2016


...hiding several other actions with different intent. Expensive licensing, waiting periods, LEO discretion as to whose is suitable, etc.

I favor inexpensive, effective, and short courses for people who carry, not the poll-tax-type of measure proposed here.
 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
7. If they were doing it about voting they'd all have their torches and pitchforks in hand
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 02:38 PM
Jan 2016

But if it's about guns, well then local sheriff's and their ilk are not only free to make up prejudicial and restrictive rules that target certain groups, but encouraged to violate any annoying state preemption laws.

Situational ethics at work again.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Gun policy puts public sa...