Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(62,657 posts)
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 01:22 PM Oct 2015

Boy shot while family poses with illegal guns in Tennessee home

Source: Reuters

US | Wed Oct 28, 2015 2:06pm EDT

Boy shot while family poses with illegal guns in Tennessee home

NASHVILLE, TENN. | BY TIM GHIANNI

Police on Wednesday investigated how a boy was shot in the face while his family posed for photos with illegal firearms in their southeastern Tennessee home.

The unidentified 13-year-old boy suffered non-life-threatening injuries and was taken to a hospital, police said.

The shooting occurred on Sunday night at a home in Harrison, Tennessee, about 20 miles east of Chattanooga, according to the Hamilton County Sheriff's Department.

"The preliminary investigation has determined (he) was accidentally shot by a family member while posing for photographs with firearms," according to a news release, which said the weapons were illegally obtained.

(Reporting by Tim Ghianni; Editing by Mary Wisniewski and Bill Trott)


http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/28/us-tennessee-shooting-boy-idUSKCN0SM2GD20151028
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Boy shot while family poses with illegal guns in Tennessee home (Original Post) Eugene Oct 2015 OP
Law abiding and responsible mikeysnot Oct 2015 #1
Well like they say, everyone is responsible until they are not. LiberalArkie Oct 2015 #2
Yeah. You can never tell when a Controller is going to snap and physically assault someone. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #7
Indeed. They could very well be interested in breaking someones "damn arms". beevul Oct 2015 #17
Angry and potentially violent, they really shouldn't have access to firearms DonP Oct 2015 #19
Well, like they say, every cell phone user is responsible until they are not. beardown Oct 2015 #25
did you miss where it said the gun was illegally obtained? gejohnston Oct 2015 #4
No but it is obvious to all mikeysnot Oct 2015 #10
When are you guys ever serious? nt Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #28
How many folks are killed and maimed by children with guns compared to any other Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #3
I don't know. Straw Man Oct 2015 #11
I am sure that more are killed with cross bows, swords, battle axes, machetes and knifes LiberalArkie Oct 2015 #15
"...since you don't have to register to get those..." beevul Oct 2015 #18
The federal firearms check that has to be done for firearms. You know that long wait before you can LiberalArkie Oct 2015 #20
Thats just a background check. beevul Oct 2015 #21
From the lips of the NRA to the comment board of DU. Battle axes....made me laugh! Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #23
Simply not true, and even if it was... beevul Oct 2015 #27
4,300 underaged drinkers die from alcohol poisoning annually. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2015 #22
More guns for everyone - it keeps us safe. patsimp Oct 2015 #5
QUICK....waht is the #1 rule of firearms??? anybody??? come on... ileus Oct 2015 #6
I fear you search for knowledge in a barren field my friend DonP Oct 2015 #8
How strange. beevul Oct 2015 #9
"Common Sense" Gun Safety Rules = No Guns DonP Oct 2015 #12
Heres a whole subthread that proves what you say to be true... beevul Oct 2015 #16
I bet they know guns kill people. ileus Oct 2015 #13
All by themselves, according to several in the group DonP Oct 2015 #14
Don't let idiots buy guns nt?? Logical Oct 2015 #24
Ahh..., the veritable "literacy tests" prior to exercising constitutional rights. branford Oct 2015 #26

LiberalArkie

(16,503 posts)
2. Well like they say, everyone is responsible until they are not.
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 01:30 PM
Oct 2015

Maybe they will buy the kid a new gun to make it up to him

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
7. Yeah. You can never tell when a Controller is going to snap and physically assault someone.
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 02:20 PM
Oct 2015

They should be strictly licensed.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
19. Angry and potentially violent, they really shouldn't have access to firearms
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 04:19 PM
Oct 2015

I'd just as soon not allow those types of people to own guns.

beardown

(363 posts)
25. Well, like they say, every cell phone user is responsible until they are not.
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 10:48 PM
Oct 2015

I assumed you implied that every gun owner is responsible until they are not. I somewhat disagree with this as I think some gun owners are never responsible, just lucky.

I applaud your effort to limit every dangerous item or activity based on it's worst case application. There is a nice scifi book on robots taking this approach to protect humans down to the point of removing common tools, etc.

Indeed, guns are a very unforgiving object when misused, but there are millions of routine uses for every worst case use. More gun safety and training? Most certainly. Will there still be some dumbass gun owners. Also, most certainly.

However, I've avoided more horrible accidents due to other drivers texting than I have observed or avoided horrible gun uses. I think it should be illegal to text and drive. I do not think we should make cell phones ownership so restrictive that only rich white guys can own them and I think demonizing cell phones diverts attention away from achievable solutions and alienates the very people that you have to buy into the solution.

Thanks for your response. Well within reasonable bounds of statements of such a hotly debated topic and you got your point across with a nice, non-violent closing line.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
4. did you miss where it said the gun was illegally obtained?
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 02:02 PM
Oct 2015

That is good indication that law abiding and responsible, they were not.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
3. How many folks are killed and maimed by children with guns compared to any other
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 01:36 PM
Oct 2015

"inanimate object" ?

Those inanimate object guns sure do get around to doing a lot of killing and maiming - by children!

Could it be because guns are objects that are designed, manufactured and sold as objects intended to kill and maim...could be...could be....what say you, NRA, to kids on kid and kid on parent death by the gun?

Let me answer for you........crickets.......and more crickets....

Straw Man

(6,771 posts)
11. I don't know.
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 02:51 PM
Oct 2015
How many folks are killed and maimed by children with guns compared to any other

"inanimate object" ?

Those inanimate object guns sure do get around to doing a lot of killing and maiming - by children!

Perhaps you could give us a number. Then we could put it in context with these other causes of accidental death:

http://listosaur.com/miscellaneous/top-5-causes-of-accidental-death-in-the-united-states/

LiberalArkie

(16,503 posts)
15. I am sure that more are killed with cross bows, swords, battle axes, machetes and knifes
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 03:05 PM
Oct 2015

since you don't have to register to get those and just about anyone can possess them. It it only make sense that more are killed with those weapons instead of firearms. You have to be a fine upstanding person of sound mind to purchase a firearm, and just any drunk or mentally ill person can purchase the other weapons. That's right isn't it?

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
18. "...since you don't have to register to get those..."
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 04:19 PM
Oct 2015
"...since you don't have to register to get those..."


I'm curious. What things do you think currently must be 'registered' to be owned, or that one must 'register' to own?

LiberalArkie

(16,503 posts)
20. The federal firearms check that has to be done for firearms. You know that long wait before you can
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 04:30 PM
Oct 2015

the firearm.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
23. From the lips of the NRA to the comment board of DU. Battle axes....made me laugh!
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 05:57 PM
Oct 2015

300 million guns...tough sledding for the NRA propagandists when toddlers are killing other children and their parents....and not with battle axes.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
27. Simply not true, and even if it was...
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 01:42 AM
Oct 2015
From the lips of the NRA to the comment board of DU.


Simply not true, and even if it was, the author is closer to the party platform than you are.

In fact, I've not seen a pro-gun poster farther from the party platform than you are, in a number of years.

That about says everything that needs saying, I think.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
22. 4,300 underaged drinkers die from alcohol poisoning annually.
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 05:27 PM
Oct 2015

Alcohol, last time I checked, was an inanimate object.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
8. I fear you search for knowledge in a barren field my friend
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 02:28 PM
Oct 2015

None of our resident "gun safety" supporters have a clue about the 4 safety rules.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
9. How strange.
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 02:34 PM
Oct 2015

They support all these 'gun safety' groups, yet haven't the foggiest idea of what 'gun safety' actually means?

Its almost like they're trying to mislead.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
12. "Common Sense" Gun Safety Rules = No Guns
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 02:54 PM
Oct 2015

That's why they keep posting examples of crimes with guns, because there's no difference in their tiny minds between law abiding people and criminals. If you own guns, you just haven't "snapped" yet.

I'm pretty sure their self congratulatory efforts and shaming aren't working too well, based on all the new gun owners we have in Illinois, a deep blue state.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
16. Heres a whole subthread that proves what you say to be true...
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 03:21 PM
Oct 2015
That's why they keep posting examples of crimes with guns, because there's no difference in their tiny minds between law abiding people and criminals. If you own guns, you just haven't "snapped" yet.


Heres a whole subthread that proves what you say to be true, in their own words:


http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027239139#post286
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
26. Ahh..., the veritable "literacy tests" prior to exercising constitutional rights.
Thu Oct 29, 2015, 12:31 AM
Oct 2015

I believe the courts and the People properly dismissed such elitist and racist ideas long ago...

However, apart from snark, if your implication was support for mandatory and nationally standardized (and reasonable) training requirements in order to publicly carry firearms, that's an idea worthy of discussion. I personally would gladly back the concept, even including universal background checks, in return for national concealed carry reciprocity. National standards and certification/licensure for a national right to carry (i.e., "shall issue" with preemption of state and local laws).

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Boy shot while family pos...