How Do You Cover The Gun "Debate" When One Side Spouts Nonsense?

[SecularMotion]

Last week's depressingly predictable news from Oregon about another American gun massacre triggered what's now become a morose tradition of news coverage, not only about the mindless murders themselves, but also about the permanent stain of domestic gun violence. (This morning brought news of yet another campus shooting.) With a presidential campaign underway, the Oregon coverage inevitably crossed over into political and campaign analysis. That meant high-profile Republican candidates weighed in on the issue and often tried to wave off as unfixable the epidemic of gun violence in America, where approximately 290 people are shot every day.

Thanks to a string of truly bizarre ("stuff happens&quot and thoughtless comments from several GOP candidates, including one that seemed to place some blame on the Umpqua Community College victims for being shot, the so-called gun debate has managed to become even more baseless.

In other words, the Republican field is once again highlighting just how radical the party has become on key issues. And that poses a growing challenge for journalists.

"Rather than engaging in an honest effort to address gun violence and prevent more senseless carnage, practically every G.O.P. candidate has been reduced to repeating a mantra that many of them, surely, cannot fully believe," wrote The New Yorker's John Cassidy this week.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/10/09/how-do-you-cover-the-gun-debate-when-one-side-s/206062

[ileus]

1. I don't really cover it....just comment from a progressive 2A pov.

[gejohnston]

2. very true, but your side

is the one spouting nonsense.

[Duckhunter935]

3. One side points out feel good

Measures will not work and the other side summarily dismisses anything presented by a firearms owner.

Of course the name calling and insults from the pro control side do not help.

[GGJohn]

4. Yeah, you're right, your side does spout nonsense repeatedly.

BTW, got any comment there SecMo?

[Big_Mike]

5. Bueller...Bueller, er excuse me: SecMo...Secmo n/t

[GGJohn]

6. LOL.

Perfect comparison.

[pablo_marmol]

7. Brazen theft alert, fellow RKBA supporting Dems:

How do you cover the gun "debate" when one side believes in unicorns that fart rainbows?

[Eleanors38]

8. This from the "former" GOP operative who employs armed bodyguards.