Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumHassleCat
(6,409 posts)I think punt guns had been retired by the time smokeless powder came along. It is interesting to consider there used to be so many waterfowl that hunters could fire a punt gun into a flock and bring down 100 birds with one shot.
PatrickforO
(15,121 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)And it took a huge toll on waterfowl. Same thing as commercial fishing.
benEzra
(12,148 posts)Basically, hunting now is an individual activity, with limits set to a family's needs rather than a food market's. Back then, hunting was also a commercial endeavour, with professional harvesters each shooting thousands or tens of thousands of birds a year to sell commercially for their meat or feathers. It was commercial harvesting, not people hunting for their own food, that drove the passenger pigeon to extinction and almost wiped out a lot of other species.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)the main threat to them now is energy exploration, destruction of the prairie pot hole region and development.
Hunting with gauges larger than .10 is prohibited, and limiting shot shell capacity to 3 for duck hunting, have also protected these wterfowl.
Some folks walk the walk, and spend the money to improve the environment.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)And they'd go out at night when thousands of ducks and geese were sleeping on the water.
The gun was a 4 gauge, you poured the powder down the barrel, stuffed some old rags in for wadding, and then used nails, gravel or whatever as shot.
It was basically a cannon, you lit a fuse which ignited the powder. With one blast you could get several hundred ducks.
I saw one of these things at the Chesapeake Bay Museum. Later on I met a guy who actually owned one. I kept pestering him to take it out and fire it but he wouldn't do it.
DonP
(6,185 posts)The muzzle looked about 4 inches across and the gun ran almost the full length of the boat, maybe 8 feet with the boat 12 to 16 feet long. They usually had several other boats to pick up the ducks.
They were "aimed" by paddling with small paddles that looked like oversize ping pong paddles.
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)in UK and asked what that was...cannon to stop prisoners or so (it was on a boat, stern mounted, 6+ foot long)
nope it was to shoot birds
i went like
dude it's bigger than the shoulder mount SAM's we use!?
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)it has reduced burglaries in my neighborhood when I got an walked a dog at night. Could have been that I was out reporting people when I came home, hehe hehe, Solved the stealing of the paper girl's money one night when I called the police.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Indian River County, has a punt gun on display. Artifact from over a century ago, and it can remain a wall hanger.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I hope they are never used against birds but only ever at clay pigeons.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)Data from a US mortality follow-back survey were analyzed to determine whether having a firearm in the home
increases the risk of a violent death in the home and whether risk varies by storage practice, type of gun, or
number of guns in the home. Those persons with guns in the home were at greater risk than those without guns
in the home of dying from a homicide in the home (adjusted odds ratio = 1.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.1, 3.4).
They were also at greater risk of dying from a firearm homicide, but risk varied by age and whether the person
was living with others at the time of death. The risk of dying from a suicide in the home was greater for males in
homes with guns than for males without guns in the home (adjusted odds ratio = 10.4, 95% confidence interval:
5.8, 18.9). Persons with guns in the home were also more likely to have died from suicide committed with a
firearm than from one committed by using a different method (adjusted odds ratio = 31.1, 95% confidence
interval: 19.5, 49.6). Results show that regardless of storage practice, type of gun, or number of firearms in the
home, having a gun in the home was associated with an increased risk of firearm homicide and firearm suicide
in the home.
http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/160/10/929.full.pdf+html
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)And also the benefits,
You know my post was a joke, right.
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)Here are 2 groups where jokes are appropriate
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1198
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1018
hack89
(39,180 posts)beardown
(363 posts)So how are cartoons appropriate, but joking vids not appropriate? I almost feel this warrants a Welch type call out against McCarthy "Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?"
As long as it leads to a relevant discussion within the SOP of the group nobody seems to care much, excepting you of course. Seeing as how the post generated discussion of the development of hunting rules and such, I'd say it was a good SOP post. Perhaps, because the posters seemed to see the methodology of business driven over-hunting was bad does not mesh with your belief that gun owners are totally unreasonable when it comes to anything gun related.
Anyway, keep up the good work of posting some debate worthy news items to this group, but you should find a way to relax and let off some steam like taking up target shooting.
sarisataka
(21,207 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Sad that a host seems to disrespect Skinner and the hosts of GD by purposely posting SOP violations.
beevul
(12,194 posts)One should be able to expect at least that much seeing as you're a group host...
I don't however, have much hope for you actually doing so.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)they increase their risk of getting injured or killed in a traffic accident.
If people keep knives in their homes, they increase the risk of getting cut or stabbed.
If people have swimming pools, they increase their risk of drowning.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Chambered in 300 blackout. Can't wait to shoot it. The great thing about the modular AR platform. Did not need to buy a whole rifle.