Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(63,925 posts)
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 02:28 PM Tuesday

Ninth Circuit panel allows Trump administration to enforce much of Trump EO pausing refugee admissions program

Chris Geidner
‪@chrisgeidner.bsky.social‬

Follow
BREAKING: Ninth Circuit panel allows the Trump administration to enforce much of Trump's executive order pausing the refugee admissions program, citing Trump v. Hawaii. There is no noted dissent, and the panel includes Silverman (Clinton) Bade (Trump) and de Alba (Biden).

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PACITO, et al
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
V.
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; et al.,
Defendants - Appellants.

Before: SILVERMAN, BADE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
ALT

The emergency motion (Docket Entry No. 5) to stay the district court's
February 28, 2025 order is granted in part, and denied in part.
The motion is denied to the extent the district court's preliminary injunction
order applies to individuals who were conditionally approved for refugee status by
the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services before January 20, 2025.
Executive Order No. 14163 does not purport to revoke the refugee status of individuals who received that status under the United States Refugee Admissions
Program prior to January 20, 2025.
ALT

In all other respects, the district court's February 28, 2025 preliminary
injunction order is stayed. See Trump v. Hawaii, 585 U.S. 667, 684 (2018)
(explaining that 8 U.S.C. § 1182(f) "exudes deference" to the President and "vests
[him] with ample power to impose entry restrictions in addition to those elsewhere
enumerated in the INA" (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Nken v.
Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009) (defining standard for stay pending appeal).
ALT
March 25, 2025 at 2:19 PM

https://bsky.app/profile/chrisgeidner.bsky.social/post/3ll7v3yflg224


https://bsky.app/profile/chrisgeidner.bsky.social/post/3ll7v4ivb5s24
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Ninth Circuit panel allow...