Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(60,949 posts)
Sun Aug 7, 2022, 05:47 AM Aug 2022

"I would have been happier if a jury had assessed the merits of the case against Alex Jones ..."

The First Amendment Retweeted

I would have been happier if a jury had assessed the merits of the case against Alex Jones as well as damages. That’s better for the rule of law and preservation of the First Amendment. I think that on a full record, only some of his statements would have been . . . .


1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"I would have been happier if a jury had assessed the merits of the case against Alex Jones ..." (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2022 OP
A response... hlthe2b Aug 2022 #1

hlthe2b

(106,359 posts)
1. A response...
Sun Aug 7, 2022, 06:20 AM
Aug 2022




Popehat's somewhat sanctimonious take seems akin to a surgeon proceeding to meticulously, laboriously excise sections of a large fully circumscribed cancerous tumor over hour upon hour upon hour (adding to the very real risk of spread, complications, and infection) rather than ligating its blood supply and removing in bulk (while likewise exploring nearby tissue and adjacent lymph nodes for spread). Get the damned thing out, and in the litigation world, look at the full extent of lies and resultant incitement as one big act that needs excision--not tender, meticulous dissection.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»"I would have been happie...