Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumVictory!!! Larry Klayman sued Rebecca Schoenkopf and @Wonkette over publications protected by 1A.
The First Amendment RetweetedVictory!!! Attorney Larry Klayman sued Rebecca Schoenkopf and
@Wonkette
over publications protected by 1A. The court repeatedly told him his lawsuit was frivolous, yet he kept filing the same allegations. The court just dismissed the suit with prejudice and will enter sanctions.
@Wonkette
over publications protected by 1A. The court repeatedly told him his lawsuit was frivolous, yet he kept filing the same allegations. The court just dismissed the suit with prejudice and will enter sanctions.
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
13 replies, 2585 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (32)
ReplyReply to this post
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Victory!!! Larry Klayman sued Rebecca Schoenkopf and @Wonkette over publications protected by 1A. (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2022
OP
JohnSJ
(96,654 posts)1. Klayman is in need of major psychiatric help
DURHAM D
(32,841 posts)2. Make him pay.
Please someone, empty his pockets.
nycbos
(6,374 posts)3. Who is the guy?
Some context would be useful.
quaint
(3,588 posts)5. Long, ugly, repetitive history.
https://floridajustice.com/larry-klayman-v-wonkette-case-status-locker-room/
Law Offices of Phillips & Hunt Law Offices of Phillips & Hunt
Law Offices of Phillips & Hunt Law Offices of Phillips & Hunt
A good day for 1A. The Court granted our Motion to Dismiss in Larry Klayman v. @wonkette and Rebecca Schoenkopf, saying, Defendants statements do not present an actionable basis for claims of defamation because they are protected statements of pure opinion or rhetorical hyperbole.
While it allows Klayman a chance to amend, it also found he was a public figure and thus subject to actual malice standard. This makes these weaponized attacks legally frivolous. The judge even noted, Finally, it cannot be seriously disputed that Plaintiff played a central role in these controversies.
We will seek fees/costs and fight any attempt at appeal. Defendants insinuation that sexual harassment is a favorite hobby of Plaintiff, or that he sued all members of a race and subpoenaed a former presidents genitals, are obvious exaggerations intended for comedic effect. Rock on, Wonkette and Rebecca. We have your back. @ Law Offices of Phillips & Hunt
While it allows Klayman a chance to amend, it also found he was a public figure and thus subject to actual malice standard. This makes these weaponized attacks legally frivolous. The judge even noted, Finally, it cannot be seriously disputed that Plaintiff played a central role in these controversies.
We will seek fees/costs and fight any attempt at appeal. Defendants insinuation that sexual harassment is a favorite hobby of Plaintiff, or that he sued all members of a race and subpoenaed a former presidents genitals, are obvious exaggerations intended for comedic effect. Rock on, Wonkette and Rebecca. We have your back. @ Law Offices of Phillips & Hunt
geardaddy
(25,350 posts)6. I know someone personally who was sued by him
for defamation. Of course Klayman lost.
quaint
(3,588 posts)8. He really needs to be sanctioned.
I hope he had to pay that person's legal costs.
geardaddy
(25,350 posts)12. I don't remember if he did
but the case went on for years. It was ridiculous.
azureblue
(2,301 posts)9. and the law office
Will get their money from Larry. He will try to play games but all that will do is run up the bill. He will try to get the law office to reduce the amount owed, you know, professional courtesy and all, but that won't happen. If he had accepted the first loss, it would be different, but his repeated abuse of the law in an attempt to intimidate Wonkette, means the law office is tired of his crap.
nuxvomica
(12,910 posts)11. The best description I've read is from the SPLC
About Larry Klayman
Larry Klayman is a pathologically litigious attorney and professional gadfly notorious for suing everyone from Irans Supreme Leader to his own mother. He has spent years denouncing Barack Obama as a crypto-Communist Muslim, convening meaningless citizens grand juries, and railing against an endless list of enemies.
Larry Klayman is a pathologically litigious attorney and professional gadfly notorious for suing everyone from Irans Supreme Leader to his own mother. He has spent years denouncing Barack Obama as a crypto-Communist Muslim, convening meaningless citizens grand juries, and railing against an endless list of enemies.
more at this link:
https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/individual/larry-klayman
quaint
(3,588 posts)13. Perfect, thank you.
getagrip_already
(17,458 posts)4. dismissed with prejudice......
I think that means he can never file that suit or any derivation of it again.
Not something a court typically does, though I'm just a ninny and in no way a legal mind..
OMGWTF
(4,449 posts)7. Wonkette is one of my favorite sites for news and great comedic writing.
Yay Rebecca!!
Grins
(7,905 posts)10. Has Klayman ever won a lawsuit?
And why isn't he part of the Elite Strike Force legal team?