Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumSupreme Court majority sympathetic to coach who prayed at midfield
COURTS & LAW
Supreme Court majority sympathetic to coach who prayed at midfield
But questions about Joe Kennedys actions and the school districts reasons for disciplining him might lead to narrow resolution
By Robert Barnes
Yesterday at 6:32 p.m. EDT
Former Bremerton High School assistant football coach Joe Kennedy takes a knee in front of the Supreme Court on Monday. (Win Mcnamee/Getty Images)
The Supreme Courts conservative justices seemed sympathetic Monday to a former high school football coach who lost his job after leading postgame prayers at midfield, but the path to a decision is complicated by both the coachs actions and the school districts purported reason for disciplining him.
Joseph A. Kennedys lawyer said the assistant coach was asking only for a private moment to take a knee and express gratitude to God on the gridiron after a game. But lawyer Paul D. Clement acknowledged that Kennedys actions at Bremerton High School near Seattle had at times gone far beyond that, including leading players and others in prayer.
And Richard B. Katskee, representing the Bremerton school district, said officials had an obligation to protect students from being coerced into religious activity they did not want. But justices said that might be rationalization, because the officials complaint to Kennedy was that his actions would be seen as government speech, violating constitutional commands against government endorsement of religion.
This may be a case about facts and not really much about law, said Justice Stephen G. Breyer, beginning his last week of oral arguments before his scheduled retirement at the end of the term. ... In general, Breyer and the courts other two liberals seemed to think Bremerton officials had tried to accommodate Kennedys request to pray silently after games, but that what he really wanted was a public platform to involve players and the greater community.
[Supreme Court takes up case of a coach and his prayers on 50-yard line]
{snip}
Mondays case is Kennedy v. Bremerton School District.
By Robert Barnes
Robert Barnes has been a Washington Post reporter and editor since 1987. He joined The Post to cover Maryland politics, and he has served in various editing positions, including metropolitan editor and national political editor. He has covered the Supreme Court since November 2006. Twitter https://twitter.com/scotusreporter
Supreme Court majority sympathetic to coach who prayed at midfield
But questions about Joe Kennedys actions and the school districts reasons for disciplining him might lead to narrow resolution
By Robert Barnes
Yesterday at 6:32 p.m. EDT
Former Bremerton High School assistant football coach Joe Kennedy takes a knee in front of the Supreme Court on Monday. (Win Mcnamee/Getty Images)
The Supreme Courts conservative justices seemed sympathetic Monday to a former high school football coach who lost his job after leading postgame prayers at midfield, but the path to a decision is complicated by both the coachs actions and the school districts purported reason for disciplining him.
Joseph A. Kennedys lawyer said the assistant coach was asking only for a private moment to take a knee and express gratitude to God on the gridiron after a game. But lawyer Paul D. Clement acknowledged that Kennedys actions at Bremerton High School near Seattle had at times gone far beyond that, including leading players and others in prayer.
And Richard B. Katskee, representing the Bremerton school district, said officials had an obligation to protect students from being coerced into religious activity they did not want. But justices said that might be rationalization, because the officials complaint to Kennedy was that his actions would be seen as government speech, violating constitutional commands against government endorsement of religion.
This may be a case about facts and not really much about law, said Justice Stephen G. Breyer, beginning his last week of oral arguments before his scheduled retirement at the end of the term. ... In general, Breyer and the courts other two liberals seemed to think Bremerton officials had tried to accommodate Kennedys request to pray silently after games, but that what he really wanted was a public platform to involve players and the greater community.
[Supreme Court takes up case of a coach and his prayers on 50-yard line]
{snip}
Mondays case is Kennedy v. Bremerton School District.
By Robert Barnes
Robert Barnes has been a Washington Post reporter and editor since 1987. He joined The Post to cover Maryland politics, and he has served in various editing positions, including metropolitan editor and national political editor. He has covered the Supreme Court since November 2006. Twitter https://twitter.com/scotusreporter
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1360 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court majority sympathetic to coach who prayed at midfield (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2022
OP
He can pray anywhere he wants... just can't "lead" or force others to join him.
lamp_shade
Apr 2022
#3
Evergreen Emerald
(13,095 posts)1. And if he prayed to Allah?
Would they be a sympathetic? That is the issue: no one religion should force itself on the community.
Separation of church and state
thomski64
(573 posts)2. Taking a knee on a football field..
...thought that was against our
"Religion"
lamp_shade
(15,092 posts)3. He can pray anywhere he wants... just can't "lead" or force others to join him.
Walleye
(35,658 posts)4. I wouldn't be surprised if this Supreme Court ordered mandatory prayers
Girard442
(6,401 posts)5. Not optimistic about this one.
"Real Christians can pray anywhere, anytime. You infidels can go pound sand. I like beer."
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
GoldandSilver
(186 posts)7. Take a knee my ass
This is an attempt to use this Supreme Court to put prayer (Christian only) back in school.
If this is allowed to stand, then using the exact same premise, I shall demand blood sacrifice and satanic chants shall be allowed to take place in a like manner and circumstance on every school property in the US!
Fucking Republikans are off the rails.