Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumIn the case of the praying football coach, both sides invoke religious freedom
In the case of the praying football coach, both sides invoke religious freedom
By Amy Howe
on Apr 24, 2022 at 6:27 pm
Joseph Kennedy, a former football coach at Bremerton High School in Washington state. (First Liberty Institute)
Joseph Kennedy had never coached football when Bremerton High School, a public school near Seattle, Washington, hired him in 2008. He was too small to play in high school, and his football experience was limited to playing for two years while he was in Hawaii serving in the Marines. ... Kennedy describes the school districts decision to hire him to coach the schools junior varsity team and to serve as an assistant for the varsity team as a fluke: His wife worked for the school district, and the athletic director thought he might be a good fit because of his military background. Fourteen years later, the man who was hired as a fluke will be at the Supreme Court, contesting the school districts decision not to renew his contract because of his post-game prayers at the 50-yard line.
Kennedy is not just trying to get his old job back. Hes also hoping to win a constitutional clash at the intersection of three First Amendment rights: the right to worship, the right to free speech, and the right of students to be free from religion imposed by school officials.
Like many cases involving school prayer, Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, which will be argued on Monday, is hotly contested. Kelly Shackelford, the president and CEO of First Liberty Institute, which is representing Kennedy, says a victory for Kennedy would be a victory for everybody that would merely reaffirm the rights to freedom of religion and free speech. By contrast, Rachel Laser, the president of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which represents the school district, warns that a ruling for Kennedy would be a radical departure from decades of well-established law protecting students religious freedom.
But in this case, Kennedy and the school district disagree not only about the legal issues and their implications, but also about many of the facts, including exactly why Kennedy lost his job. Kennedy says he was fired for briefly and privately praying at midfield; Laser and the school district counter that he was suspended for refusing to stop holding public prayers at the 50-yard line, which created both pressure for students to join him and genuine safety concerns for students on the fields because of the spectacle that ensued from his media outreach on praying.
{snip}
This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.
{snip}
Recommended Citation: Amy Howe, In the case of the praying football coach, both sides invoke religious freedom, SCOTUSblog (Apr. 24, 2022, 6:27 PM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/04/in-the-case-of-the-praying-football-coach-both-sides-invoke-religious-freedom/
exboyfil
(18,000 posts)by tromping to the 50 yard line to pray.
walkingman
(8,343 posts)opposite. Every Christian I have ever met always wants to tell me about it whether I want to hear it or not.
If they didn't tell me, how would I know they were Christian?? Maybe a sticker on their car? or some chachkies in their home?
I was walking in my neighborhood and a lady stopped her car to tell me about a "prayer throw" she and her friends were making. I asked what that meant....they pray for people while they are making it....I asked "does that really work?" Of course....she has never spoken to me since....What's up with that?
Ocelot II
(120,858 posts)has always struck me as an obnoxiously superficial waste of God's time, maybe even borderline blasphemous - if you believe in God - and even if you don't, it's still obnoxious and superficial.
samnsara
(18,282 posts)..and there are plenty of other christian based private schools that coach can go pray at.
Turbineguy
(38,378 posts)It's high school football.
Pray that Putin doesn't cause a nuclear war.
Gore1FL
(21,887 posts)It's a far cry from praying in a closet and shutting the door behind him, however.
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)A crowd joined him "spontaneously", and the coach called a State Legislator to participate in the gathering. Pete Williams said it was a "spectacle."
Grins
(7,889 posts)By his superiors on the school board.
He did it anyway.
Insubordination is a firing offense in EVERY company and government office.
The religious Freedumb! defense is a diversion.
cbabe
(4,163 posts)Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)right to practice one's religion amount to an attempt to establish a state religion.
The case will be very fact driven so if the facts aren't clear it should be remanded.
It's not obvious what he was praying for. It wasn't victory since the prayer occurred after the game.
9 judges from the 9th Circuit dissented in favor of the coach's claim? If that's true he will certainly win before this supreme court.
Good article. Scotusblog. I should have known.
sop
(11,198 posts)(New York Times) "The Supreme Court ruled that Hialeah's ban on ritual animal sacrifice violated the religious freedom of the followers of an Afro-Cuban religion in which the sacrifice of animals plays a central role...All nine Justices agreed that the prohibition, enacted in 1987 by the City of Hialeah, violated the First Amendment's guarantee of the free exercise of religion."
DBoon
(23,054 posts)If you allow one ancient superstition in, why not have them all?
Girard442
(6,401 posts)...then those Satan-worshipping coaches are about to have their day.
keithbvadu2
(40,120 posts)Many of our right wing brethren want to put public prayer and the Bible back in the schools.
They have no qualms about using the gov't to foist their own religious beliefs on the children in public schools without letting the parents decide how they want their children raised.
sop
(11,198 posts)banning CRT, "don't say gay" legislation and eliminating certain textbooks. They believe parents should decide what their children are exposed to in the schools...so long as they approve of it.
iscooterliberally
(3,010 posts)Karadeniz
(23,423 posts)invoked, questioning about religious belief won't happen. To a truly spiritual person, following spiritual beliefs is more important than seeking legal support. Jesus makes it crystal clear that prayer is a personal affair conducted in private. So why would a sincere Christian go to the courts to legally defy Jesus's instructions? Makes no sense. The courts have already given Christians time for silent prayer, in accordance with Jesus's mandate. When the courts have already supported Christian doctrine, why would a Christian want that verdict overturned.
SCantiGOP
(14,239 posts)Erecting a wall between church and State is the only way to guarantee a free society.
Thomas Jefferson
mahatmakanejeeves
(60,949 posts)A lot of quotes attributed to Jefferson aren't things he said. This one is a lot closer than most, but let's go to the source to see what he really did say.
Thomas Jefferson and Religious Freedom
An Article Courtesy Of The Thomas Jefferson Encyclopedia. Click For More.
Thomas Jefferson has been closely associated with religious freedom for more than two centuries. In the first Supreme Court case addressing the religion clauses of the First Amendment, Reynolds v. United States, the Court unanimously agreed that Jeffersons Statute for Religious Freedom defined religious liberty and the true distinction between what properly belongs to the church and what to the State.
{snip}
ADDITIONAL QUOTES
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.19
{snip}
- John Ragosta, 4/16/18
{snip}
19.Jefferson to Danbury Baptists, January 1, 1802, in PTJ, 36:258. Transcription available at Founders Online.
V. To the Danbury Baptist Association
Gentlemen Jan. 1. 1802.
The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful & zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.
I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem.
Th: Jefferson
SCantiGOP
(14,239 posts)The phrase separation of church and state derives from a letter by President Jefferson in 1802 where he wrote: Erecting the wall of separation between church and state is absolutely essential in a free society. The wellspring of American anti-establishment thinking, however, was Jefferson's successor, James Madison ...
keithbvadu2
(40,120 posts)What will they say/do when it is not their version of Christianity in charge?
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/americas-true-history-of-religious-tolerance-61312684/?no-ist= ;
Madison also made a point that any believer of any religion should understand: that the government sanction of a religion was, in essence, a threat to religion. "Who does not see," he wrote, "that the same authority which can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other Religions, may establish with the same ease any particular sect of Christians, in exclusion of all other Sects?" Madison was writing from his memory of Baptist ministers being arrested in his native Virginia.
keithbvadu2
(40,120 posts)Matthew 6:5-8 King James Version
5 And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
7 But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.
8 Be not ye therefore like unto them: for your Father knoweth what things ye have need of, before ye ask him.