Civil Liberties
Related: About this forum"[Robert] Reich has two ideas that he thinks don't undermine free speech. He's simply wrong."
Robert Reich is a beloved DU icon. His tweets get posted here all the time.
That doesn't mean he can't be wrong.
This thread of Ari Cohn's should upset DU's large "the FCC should ban Fox News" contingent.
Full disclosure: Robert Reich was a Rhodes Scholar who went to Oxford. After that, he attended Yale Law. I went to Northern Virginia Community College. I am not a lawyer.
JeSuisJortsHat Retweeted
Prof. Reich has two ideas that he thinks don't undermine free speech. He's simply wrong.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
(Assuming you recognize that there is a critical problem to be solved here.)
I don't need to have a "better idea" to criticize a bad idea.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
JohnSJ
(96,541 posts)sop
(11,198 posts)The Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fairness Doctrine of 1949 and the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974 were all laws created to solve society's problems.
Ocelot II
(120,858 posts)Laws can fix a social problem only if they define specific conduct as unlawful and provide a remedy if the conduct occurs. Outlawing anger is impossible; a society can only outlaw conduct.
sop
(11,198 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(18,517 posts)I think social media platforms should be classified as publishers, and held responsible for the content they publish. Just like a book publisher or magazine, if they allow libelous material or something that harms a community or incites violence, they should able to be sued.
No First amendment censorship, just accountability.