Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumCourt wary of warrantless blood tests in DUI cases
Source: Associated Press
Court wary of warrantless blood tests in DUI cases
AP foreign, Wednesday January 9 2013
MARK SHERMAN
Associated Press= WASHINGTON (AP) The Supreme Court appeared reluctant Wednesday to allow police to routinely order blood tests for unwilling drunken-driving suspects without at least trying to obtain a search warrant from a judge.
The court heard arguments Wednesday in a case about a disputed blood test from Missouri, against the backdrop of a serious national problem of more than 10,000 deaths from crashes involving alcohol-impaired drivers in 2010, about one every 51 minutes.
That number has dropped by 60 percent in the past 20 years because of a sustained national crackdown on drunken driving. Lawyers for Missouri and the Obama administration argued that dispensing with a warrant requirement would further that effort because any delay in testing a suspect's blood-alcohol content allows alcohol to dissipate in the blood.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
But justices across the ideological spectrum questioned whether the intrusive procedure of sticking a needle in someone's arm to draw blood should routinely be done without the approval of a judge. At the same time, they made clear that they did not want to unduly delay the collection of blood samples.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
AP foreign, Wednesday January 9 2013
MARK SHERMAN
Associated Press= WASHINGTON (AP) The Supreme Court appeared reluctant Wednesday to allow police to routinely order blood tests for unwilling drunken-driving suspects without at least trying to obtain a search warrant from a judge.
The court heard arguments Wednesday in a case about a disputed blood test from Missouri, against the backdrop of a serious national problem of more than 10,000 deaths from crashes involving alcohol-impaired drivers in 2010, about one every 51 minutes.
That number has dropped by 60 percent in the past 20 years because of a sustained national crackdown on drunken driving. Lawyers for Missouri and the Obama administration argued that dispensing with a warrant requirement would further that effort because any delay in testing a suspect's blood-alcohol content allows alcohol to dissipate in the blood.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
But justices across the ideological spectrum questioned whether the intrusive procedure of sticking a needle in someone's arm to draw blood should routinely be done without the approval of a judge. At the same time, they made clear that they did not want to unduly delay the collection of blood samples.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/10603652
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 2133 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court wary of warrantless blood tests in DUI cases (Original Post)
Eugene
Jan 2013
OP
Maybe the police see the trend toward legal marijuana and are looking for some new angles to
limpyhobbler
Jan 2013
#3
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)1. Why not use these
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)2. I heard about this case ...
this morning. It's hard for me to comprehend the state arguing that sticking a needle in someone's arm and drawing blood from them, over their objection, is NOT a violation of one's bodily integrity.
It's more troubling when the record shows that the vast majority of warrants were secured in less than 1/2 hour!
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)3. Maybe the police see the trend toward legal marijuana and are looking for some new angles to
arrest people and make money. Once they loose all that money and work from weed arrests, they are going to have to find something else to do to justify their jobs.