Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumHow a 'watch list' was defeated in the Fifties: the case of Kent v. Dulles
X-posted from GD:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027954652
Return with me now to a time when the moral panic du jour was about 'subversives',
not terrorists:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_v._Dulles
Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116 (1958), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case on the right to travel and passport restrictions as they relate to First Amendment free speech rights. It was the first case in which the U.S. Supreme Court made a distinction between the constitutionally protected substantive due process freedom of movement and the right to travel abroad (subsequently characterized as "right to international travel".[edit]
Rockwell Kent wanted to travel to England to attend a meeting of the World Council of Peace in Helsinki, Finland. He was denied a passport because he was allegedly a Communist and was alleged to have "a consistent and prolonged adherence to the Communist Party line." Kent sued in U.S. District Court for declaratory relief. The District Court granted summary judgment against him.
On appeal, Kent's case was heard with that of Dr. Walter Briehl, a psychiatrist. When Briehl applied for a passport, the Director of the Passport Office asked him to supply an affidavit with respect to his membership in the Communist Party. Briehl, like Kent, refused. His application for a passport was tentatively disapproved. Briehl filed his complaint in the District Court, which held that his case was indistinguishable from Kent's and dismissed it...
...The cases were heard on writ of certiorari. 355 U.S. 881. The Court reversed the Court of Appeals. Kent v Dulles was the first case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the right to travel is a part of the "liberty" of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment. It did not decide the extent to which this liberty right can be curtailed. The Court was first concerned with the extent, if any, to which Congress had authorized its curtailment by the U.S. Secretary of State. The Court found that the Secretary of State exceeded his authority by refusing to issue passports to Communists.
Too bad Dulles didn't realize that he should have called his black list a "watch list";
he then would have had plenty of support from Democrats...
Dustlawyer
(10,518 posts)I have never had a hearing, they have automatic Probable Cause to subject me to enhanced screening and searches. Now they want to take away my right to own a firearm.
Last December I took the concealed carry class in Texas because of these rumors. My instructor told me it would take about 2 weeks to get my permit after mailing everything off. Almost 3 months went by, but I got it! I still haven't bought a gun because I didn't get the certification for that reason. I got it to help prove I am not the terrorists from South Yemen that used my very common name as an alias. At least that is the BS story the FBI told me why I was on the list.
Don't let the issue with these horrible mass murders cause you to support another wrong in the name of reducing gun violence. There are literally millions of innocent Americans on this list with no way to get off of it.