Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 11:59 AM Dec 2015

Tenth Circuit Overturns Sanctions in Voting Rights Case

National Law Journal

Tenth Circuit Overturns Sanctions in Voting Rights Case
Amanda Bronstad
12/02/2015

Plaintiffs lawyers who brought a challenge to a political redistricting plan in Albuquerque were wrongly ordered to pay $48,217.95 in attorney fees as a sanction for dragging out the litigation, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit found that U.S. District Judge William Johnson of New Mexico abused his discretion in calculating the amount of the sanction against the lawyers based on the date they received a damaging expert report from the city. The plaintiffs did not dismiss their case after receiving the report.

The panel vacated the award and, voting 2-1, told Johnson to reconsider the imposition of a sanction. The majority noted that “lawyers and litigants generally should have some reasonable leeway to review ostensibly damaging materials, even if the materials are, ultimately, the last straw proving their case’s weakness.” The panel majority did not express an opinion on whether fees should be imposed on remand.

In a dissent, Circuit Judge Gregory Phillips wrote that no sanction was appropriate.

“I fear that the unintended but lasting result of this decision will be to frighten off potential voting-rights challengers and their attorneys lest they suffer considerable sanctions,” Phillips wrote.
(emphasis added)

-skip-

The plaintiffs brought their case in the Second Judicial District Court in Bernalillo County, New Mexico, on behalf of four Latino voters challenging the city’s redistricting plan, which they claimed violated the Voting Rights Act and equal protection clauses of the U.S. and New Mexico constitutions. They sought injunctive relief to halt the redistricting plan, alleging it was stacked against the city’s growing Latino population.

The case was removed to federal court, where the plaintiffs lawyers moved to dismiss without prejudice, citing impending city council elections. ...

More
http://m.nationallawjournal.com/module/alm/app/nlj.do?cn=20151203&pt=Daily%20Headlines&src=EMC-Email&et=editorial&bu=National%20Law%20Journal?/article/1757153546#!/article/1757153546

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Tenth Circuit Overturns S...