Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

douglas9

(5,457 posts)
Mon Dec 15, 2025, 01:03 PM Monday

Lawyer Sues The IRS, Demanding It Recognize Pets As Legal Dependents

Americans love their pets. Dogs sleep at the foot of the bed, cats rule entire households, and pet photos and videos draw millions of likes on social media. It’s no surprise, then, that nearly all U.S. pet owners (97%) say their pets are part of their family.

While millions of U.S. households (about 94 million families) own one or more pets, pets are not considered part of the family for tax purposes. A recently filed case in district court aims to change that. Amanda Reynolds, an attorney licensed in New York and Utah who focuses largely on civil litigation insurance defense, recently filed a complaint in the Eastern District of New York, together with Finnegan Mary Reynolds. The catch? Finnegan is Amanda’s dog.

Background and Facts

Reynolds says that Finnegan, her eight-year-old golden retriever, is entirely dependent on her for food, shelter, medical care, training, transportation, and daily living. Finnegan has no independent income, resides exclusively with her, and has annual expenses exceeding $5,000. That means, Reynolds argues, that Finnegan satisfies every meaningful element of dependency recognized under section 152 of the Internal Revenue Code—except for being human. As a result, Reynolds has asked the court to determine whether pets can be recognized as non-human dependents under federal tax law.

According to the complaint, while dogs are legally classified as property, that does not fully reflect their role within families and households. Reynolds says that Finnegan’s care responsibilities mirror, and sometimes surpass, those of human dependents. Reynolds writes that “For all intents and purposes, Finnegan is like a daughter, and is definitely a ‘dependent’.”

Despite this, Reynolds notes, the tax code doesn’t allow relief for taxpayers who shoulder the financial burden of companion animals, even though it provides various credits and deductions—such as the Child Tax Credit, Dependent Care Credit, and Earned Income Tax Credit—for human dependents.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2025/12/12/lawyer-sues-the-irs-demanding-it-recognize-pets-as-legal-dependents/?ctpv=xlrecirc




11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawyer Sues The IRS, Demanding It Recognize Pets As Legal Dependents (Original Post) douglas9 Monday OP
Each pet would require a soc sec number.. BlueWaveNeverEnd Monday #1
Shady Vance says we don't want to encourage those crazy cat ladies. Diamond_Dog Monday #2
Eating them would earn the violator an arrest on violation of civil rights charges. marble falls Tuesday #7
My sea monkeys dweller Monday #3
Register them to vote: just think, your sea minkeys gonna have their own Congressman! marble falls Tuesday #8
Oh great. Trump will declare the entire GOP as dependents on his taxes Raven123 Monday #4
Only if cockroaches and viruses are included drmeow Monday #5
Sorry, I thought lap dogs were included Raven123 Monday #6
Good point drmeow Tuesday #10
We'd make out like bandits here on the farm Bayard Tuesday #9
But of course! niyad Thursday #11

drmeow

(5,891 posts)
10. Good point
Tue Dec 16, 2025, 07:00 PM
Tuesday

I find it hard to view them as anything as pleasant as a lap dog but they certainly behave that way.

Bayard

(28,319 posts)
9. We'd make out like bandits here on the farm
Tue Dec 16, 2025, 01:09 PM
Tuesday

Seventeen goats alone, that are nothing but pets.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Pets»Lawyer Sues The IRS, Dema...