Cooking & Baking
Related: About this forumReport on my induction range
It is, as several of you guys warned me, a slow learning curve, and it doesn't help that my husband, enamored, has not let me close to the stove for 10 days now.
I do like its speed, and I like the circles which show you how to center your pans--I had trouble with the gas range getting the pans in the right place. I like the warming area, which I've used so far to warm the cast iron skillets after I clean them.
Two problems: All our skillets that aren't cast iron (and I've inherited a bunch of them) are aluminum, so I'm going to need to buy a couple of lightweight skillets with steel bottoms. I am old, and frankly the cast iron ones are way too heavy for me. I checked out a few on the internet and was shocked by the price. I'm going to go to Marshall's, where I've found nice pots before at a reasonable price. Any advice on skillets?
My second problem is that you're not supposed to drag the pans across the cooking surface, and I have some good recipes that call for browned butter, which I make by sliding (jiggling sort of) the pan on the cooking surface. And what about omelets? Any suggestions about this?
And yes! Cooking on a paper towel works! The problem is that the paper towel covers the rings of the smaller burners, and I can't be sure I'm centered. But if nothing else, this is a great parlor trick.
Again, thanks to all of you who helped me get over my fear of the new!
AndyS
(14,559 posts)the faster it will heat.
pandr32
(12,165 posts)I hope to get one by summer. Fortunately, I have all steel cookware and several cast iron pans. No aluminum.
Sounds like you might use less energy.
Happy Valentines eve! 💌
cyclonefence
(4,873 posts)Although I'm a gas range fanatic, the one we had had a poorly-designed cooktop and a problem with knobs/burners (it was a Kitchenaid, and I learned that the knob problem was a well known flaw--and expensive to have repaired. It broke three times), and I had grown to hate it. It's really nice to have a cooktop I can use without having the whole center taken up by a never-used griddle space, too.
So far, I'm very pleased and hope you will be, too.
rsdsharp
(10,115 posts)but they are quite a bit lighter, and usually reasonably priced. Most restaurants use them.
TygrBright
(20,987 posts)They usually have very durable skillets that are relatively inexpensive.
helpfully,
Bright
cyclonefence
(4,873 posts)Thank you--I'll have a look.
Nittersing
(6,849 posts)I found the carbon steel pans to be too heavy for me.
I've been really happy with my Cuisinart stainless steel pans but they do have a learning curve.
cyclonefence
(4,873 posts)I am very weak in my arms and shoulders, and the cast iron skillets are out of the question for me to use. I also want a light-weight skillet for sauteing and other quick-cook dishes, and it's hard for me to imagine heat-retaining cast iron being good for that.
I'll check out the Cuisinart pans.
Callalily
(15,012 posts)I bought two really nice induction ready pans for a song. And I don't even have an induction range.
The above poster is correct about the weight of carbon steel pans. I have one, (nicely seasoned). I use it for recipes that finish off in the oven.
Old Crank
(4,641 posts)They have the induction symbol on the bottom.
Most pots do these days. They also have a reasonable frying pan that is nonstick for induction.
When I looked at some restaurant supply stores the cheap frying pans weren't induction ready. That will change as commercial places also head that way.
I jiggle smooth pans on my induction top. You can't do what J. Pepin does with a French omlet on a gas top on induction but it works.