Is this an interesting use of Genealogy Databases or an invasion of privacy?

[Rosie1223]

http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/09/justice/washington-cold-case/index.html?hpt=hp_t3

I had no idea that a genealogy research DNA submission was available for public access. I've not done it myself, does anyone else know about this?

[kdmorris]

1. From my perspective... it shouldn't be used like this

The use of DNA sampling to link people to common ancestors is a great tool to break down brick walls. But I had no idea that they could be used like this. And all this has done is cast suspicion on all of this "Fuller" guy's descendents. Did it really help them that much?

[kickysnana]

2. Reminds me of the "Jewish problem" in the last century. This will be misused at some point.

The question is by who and on whom.

But DNA test security is like the internet security one must figure that it is public knowledge once "the message" it leaves your person.

[csziggy]

3. It certainly makes me think twice about asking for DNA testing

We have a brick wall in my mother's father's side of the family. Since my cousins are direct line male descendants, I've thought about asking them to donate samples for DNA testing to see if we can tie into any of the previously testing lines of that name.

But now I don't think I will. There is too much potential for misuse of the data. And his sons and grandchildren are activists. I would hate for my curiosity to lead to adverse things happening to them because of their DNA.

[CanonRay]

4. My wife is descended from Robert Fuller. I hadn't hear of this

thanks for posting it.

[frogmarch]

5. Wow, I'd call it an invasion of privacy.

In this case, does the end justify the means? Maybe it does, but it creeps me out that anyone who wishes to can have access to DNA profiles in a genealogy database.