Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
anyone familiar with this Dr. Spence who claims that DNA analysis is a HOAX? (Original Post) grasswire Feb 2015 OP
My Grandmother was Dutch. Turbineguy Feb 2015 #1
Uh oh...sounds like somebody is afraid... ret5hd Feb 2015 #2
well I never thought of that possibility grasswire Feb 2015 #3
anti-vaxxer and... ret5hd Feb 2015 #4
ha! grasswire Feb 2015 #5
I read the link & the Telegraph article. Hmm, just about to send in my kit too. I wonder if there appalachiablue Feb 2015 #6
Well the test I did pipi_k Feb 2015 #8
Thanks for the info., good to know. 46 pages of relations interesting. Looking forward to our appalachiablue Mar 2015 #11
Found some interesting info myself. PyaarRevolution Jan 2016 #14
You could ask the people at this blog llink: http://www.uncommondescent.com/off-topic/ba77s-off-topi Joe Chi Minh Apr 2015 #13
Forgot to mention, some companies permit you to match/find relatives with same DNA appalachiablue Feb 2015 #7
Something about that webpage made me feel like I need to run Norton. DebJ Mar 2015 #9
yeah, weird grasswire Mar 2015 #10
I don't know anything about this Dr. Spence, Matilda Mar 2015 #12

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
3. well I never thought of that possibility
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 07:13 PM
Feb 2015

interesting. But I suspect it is some other kind of paranoia. He lives in a yurt in the woods and is a timber man. Probably an anti-vaxxer, too.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
5. ha!
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 07:24 PM
Feb 2015

His mother had black hair and a medium complexion, but if I had to guess anything I would say there might be some Native American blood there just from the facial structure. Just my ignorant guess, though.

appalachiablue

(42,906 posts)
6. I read the link & the Telegraph article. Hmm, just about to send in my kit too. I wonder if there
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 09:04 PM
Feb 2015

could be concern about the testing & any records for criminal links/associations, also mistakes and privacy issues. And the ancestral & racial origins info. factors. I don't know enough about this yet, but thought the tests were legit.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
8. Well the test I did
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 10:29 PM
Feb 2015

With Ancestry connected me with 46 pages full of people with matching DNA


Four of those people are my first to fourth cousins who have also taken the test. I already knew we were related because we contacted each other 5 or more years ago, way before doing the test, so I would say there is a high probability that the test I did with Ancestry is accurate with regards to the rest of the cousins listed

appalachiablue

(42,906 posts)
11. Thanks for the info., good to know. 46 pages of relations interesting. Looking forward to our
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:04 PM
Mar 2015

results esp. ancestry origin. Most is No. European with possible Iberian (Portuguese) and Native American background based on family oral history and photographs. That would be really valuable.

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
14. Found some interesting info myself.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:56 AM
Jan 2016

A portion of my DNA is from the Iberian Peninsula and then an even smaller portion(very small) is North African. Knowing about Charlemagne driving out the Black Muslims in Spain at the time and knowing the ethnic group makes me suspect I have Fulani blood since they were the Muslims at the time around that region. That was their ethnicity so to speak but their behavior was that of nomads, they were known as the Berber. The Berbers are still around today to my knowledge.

Joe Chi Minh

(15,229 posts)
13. You could ask the people at this blog llink: http://www.uncommondescent.com/off-topic/ba77s-off-topi
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 03:36 PM
Apr 2015

Excepting yours truly, they all seem to be brilliant scientists, lawyers, etc., and have a particular interest in DNA and the latest discoveries in quantum physics concerning it.

PS: The address is a lot longer than it appears above, but I tried it and it works - shows the full address.

appalachiablue

(42,906 posts)
7. Forgot to mention, some companies permit you to match/find relatives with same DNA
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 09:17 PM
Feb 2015

if it's in their data base & you want to. So interested people with links contact each other I guess. An article I read was about a young woman who used the '23andMe' kit & linked to a sibling by her father before his marriage to her mother I believe. Maybe this is another issue. I ordered a kit from Ancestry.com, discussed mostly how far back the tracing can go. If you call them (free 800 no.) I'm sure they could tell you more about the system. Best of luck.

DebJ

(7,699 posts)
9. Something about that webpage made me feel like I need to run Norton.
Sun Mar 1, 2015, 04:38 AM
Mar 2015

Seemed like gobble de gook to me, the way it was written.


Perhaps a better written, logical point would have been to say that people who anticipate that these tests will give you
an actual family tree will be disappointed? One of the article links pointed out that you might get, for an example,
something indicating who your 16th great grandmother was, but that she would only be one of many 16th great grandmothers.

Well, no! DUH.

I don't think these articles were worth anything for anyone with a concept of genealogy.

Matilda

(6,384 posts)
12. I don't know anything about this Dr. Spence,
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 02:49 AM
Mar 2015

but I've been doing a lot of reading about DNA testing, partly out of curiosity about whether I could trace where my more distant ancestors came from, and more recently because of my interest in the testing carried out on the descendants of the sister of Richard III.

The second case is undoubtedly genuine, but when you consider the issues - the rarity of the find, and the importance of correct identification, you know that many thousands, tens of thousands, of pounds would have been spent in the testing process. They couldn't afford the tiniest error on that one.

But while this is technically possible, it does seem that only the most general kind of testing can be carried out on all the individuals who want to find out where they came from, because there isn't the time or resources to be as thorough as people might wish. The fact that the results from various sites can vary is proof that while the science is genuine, the process of mass testing leaves a lot to be desired.

Dr Spence seems to imply that it's all a cynical con game, and maybe that's true to some degree. I think it probably is a way of cashing in on the great interest in genealogy that's come about from series like Who Do You Think You Are?, and there are accredited websites that do imply they can achieve much more than they really can, even claiming you might find a link to Elizabeth I, or Louis IV, etc. To prove a link to anybody who died hundreds of years ago, you'd need not only your DNA but theirs as well, so unless family records show your descent from somebody illustrious, you're never going to be able to prove it.

I decided to save my money and just keep ploughing through records now and then to see if anything new has come up.


Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Ancestry/Genealogy»anyone familiar with this...