Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

fizzgig

(24,146 posts)
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 12:28 PM Oct 2013

It's Time To Rediscover The IUD, Women's Health Advocates Say

What will it take to make intrauterine devices sexy?

IUDs are highly effective forms of contraception, but fear of side effects, lack of training for doctors and costs can keep women away. Health organizations and private companies are trying to change that by breaking down misconceptions and broadening access.

The contraceptives are inserted into the uterus and can prevent pregnancy for years. And they're reversible. Shortly after they're taken out, a woman can become pregnant.

IUDs are more than 99 percent effective. The World Health Organization reports they are "the most widely used reversible contraceptive method globally." But few women in the U.S. use them; the percentage is only in the single digits, in part because IUDs have a checkered past. The Dalkon Shield IUD, marketed nationwide beginning in 1971, was found to raise the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease. Medical complications and deaths sparked lawsuits with thousands of claimants.


the rest from npr


i just had my second one inserted over the summer, this first one broke own to a total cost of 30 buck a year. this one was a grand, but thanks to the ACA, i only paid for the insertion. yes, i do get very painful cramping one a day a month, but this is a wonderful form of birth control for me.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's Time To Rediscover The IUD, Women's Health Advocates Say (Original Post) fizzgig Oct 2013 OP
Checkered past is putting it mildly. enlightenment Oct 2013 #1
my mom was concerned when i first got mine fizzgig Oct 2013 #3
They all raise the risk of PID Warpy Oct 2013 #2
i pushed my copper t the full ten years fizzgig Oct 2013 #4
My daughter has Mirena Freddie Oct 2013 #5

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
1. Checkered past is putting it mildly.
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 12:36 PM
Oct 2013

We called them death on a string. The Dalkon Shield was a nightmare; the copper "7" was an invitation to a disaster . . .

I hope they have improved.

fizzgig

(24,146 posts)
3. my mom was concerned when i first got mine
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 12:57 PM
Oct 2013

because she remembered the dalkon shield. i had my last one for ten years with no issues.

Warpy

(113,130 posts)
2. They all raise the risk of PID
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 12:42 PM
Oct 2013

They need to be removed and reimplanted every five years, something they didn't know in the 70s.

However, if I had it to do all over again, I'd still get one, knowing about the week in the hospital eight years later. I couldn't take hormonal stuff and pregnancy would have burned out what's left of my kidneys. No thanks.

fizzgig

(24,146 posts)
4. i pushed my copper t the full ten years
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 01:02 PM
Oct 2013

the monthly discomfort got really bad toward the end, so i may not push this one that far.

i started pumping bc hormones into my body at 16, at 22 i decided that was enough. i'm very thankful for this alternative.

Freddie

(9,693 posts)
5. My daughter has Mirena
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 02:00 PM
Oct 2013

The fairly new hormonal IUD. The small dose of hormone (much less than the Pill) negates the painful monthly cramps that can happen with the regular IUD. After a few months she had no period at all just occasional very light spotting, plus no cramps. She is very happy with it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Pro-Choice»It's Time To Rediscover T...