New California Law Protects Digital Privacy of Abortion Seekers Nationwide

[niyad]

New California Law Protects Digital Privacy of Abortion Seekers Nationwide
9/12/2022 by Carrie N. Baker


In the wake of the overturn of Roe v. Wade, abortion rights advocates are warning of a massive increase in digital surveillance of abortion seekers. (Ivan Radic / Flickr)

Last week the California legislature passed a bill providing groundbreaking digital privacy protections for abortion-related communications sent through California tech companies. Assembly Bill 1242, introduced by Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D-Orinda), bars telecommunications companies incorporated or headquartered in California from providing records of digital communications related to abortion to law enforcement officials seeking to use them in an investigation or prosecution for abortion that is legal under California law. “This is an unprecedented step to protect abortion privacy across the country,” said Assemblymember Bauer-Kahan. “We have no obligation to be complicit in enforcing laws that are antithetical to our own values and legal system in California.”

The bill could prevent the kind of situation that recently happened in Nebraska, where the state is criminally prosecuting a mother and her 17-year-old daughter for an abortion based in part on Facebook messages where they discussed abortion pills, which Nebraska law enforcement officials subpoenaed from Meta.

We have no obligation to be complicit in enforcing laws that are antithetical to our own values and legal system in California.
Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan

“California’s AB 1242 could be a huge step forward in protecting people’s digital privacy as they navigate abortion access in this post-Roe world, especially as people increasingly turn to self-managed abortion,” said Elisa Wells, co-founder and co-director of Plan C, which provides up-to-date information on how people in the U.S. are accessing at-home abortion pill options online. “While self-managed abortion using pills is extremely safe and effective from a medical perspective, we know that people have been unjustly criminalized for managing their own abortions and that digital footprints have been used by prosecutors to build cases against people. Plan C welcomes this effort to strengthen digital privacy. Abortion is normal healthcare and no one should be investigated or criminalized for it.” The bill would authorize the California Attorney General to sue California corporations to compel their compliance with the law, and would impose civil liability if the corporation knew or should have known that the warrant, subpoena or other legal process related to an investigation into or enforcement of a criminal abortion law. The bill is now on California Governor Gavin Newsom’s desk awaiting his signature.

. . . . .



Assembly Bill 1242 was one of 13 bills that passed the California legislature at the end of the session last week, including AB 2019 protecting abortion-related medical information from disclosure. The bills were part of a legislative package introduced by the California Legislative Women’s Caucus and backed by the California Future of Abortion Council, a coalition that includes abortion rights advocacy groups. The Council released a statement celebrating the passage of the legislation: “As more states enact total or extreme bans on abortion care—leaving millions of people without the ability to access legal abortion care in their home state—California continues to provide a blueprint for what is possible when policy centers people, equity, science and medicine; and trusts each person to make the best decisions for themselves and their family about their healthcare options.”

https://msmagazine.com/2022/09/12/california-law-digital-privacy-abortion-seekers/

[ShazzieB]

1. Excellent!

As much as I hate these awful draconian abortion bans, what makes me the angriest is the idea of spying on people and then punishing them for something they did in a different state that was perfectly legal there. That's not how the law is supposed to work. States can make whatever laws they want about what is allowed in their state. They don't get to enforce those laws outside their own borders!

And yet I'll bet the same states would be the first to vociferously defend the idea of states' rights, at the same time that they're trying to violate the rights of other states to determine what's legal within their own borders!

[Kath2]

2. That is good news.

I hope more states follow their lead.

This is all so mind boggling to me. I was so naive. In 1980, when I was 22, I had my birth control pills, Planned Parenthood was my only health care provider and I was certain that abortion access would always be available. I couldn't have imagined all of this going on in 2022.

[niyad]

3. Many of us knew in 73 that the woman-haters would never give up. We just

really did not know how ugly they would become.

[Kath2]

4. Yes.

Ugly and dangerous to women's health.

I really makes me angry that an illegitimate president appoints horrible Supreme Court justices and their ruling against Roe stands.