Pro-Choice
Related: About this forumcould you support a pro life candidate
Relevance
In wisconsin one of the possible people who might run against scott walker is apparently antichoice.
in the wisconsin forum it is currently under discussion
as much as i hate scott walker -- and i do hate him.
i do not think i could actually work on a campaign that is anti choice
a bridge too far so the say.
what do you folks think?
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)I just hope we get a candidate with a snowball's chance in hell against Walker.
We have a VERY tough battle ahead of us in this recall and anyone here on DU who thinks otherwise is completely mistaken.
GodlessBiker
(6,314 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)But there's currently no declared race yet either.
GodlessBiker
(6,314 posts)Jumping John
(930 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)I dunno. I don't think I could even if that person were liberal in other ways.
RZM
(8,556 posts)Abortion is just one of a myriad of issues politicians deal with. You're going to get the same outcome on abortion issues no matter which candidate wins. But you won't get the same outcome on many other issues and that's the point, I think.
The district I was born and grew up in was represented by a pro-life Democrat for 24 years. He was quite popular and had strong bipartisan support in the district. He was pretty much untouchable and probably could have stayed in the seat until he died. He decided to leave the House in 2002 to take a job with the UN and was promptly replaced by a Republican who will likely stay in the seat as long as he wants (I predict he will eventually try for the Senate or governor's mansion).
The Democrat probably would have voted the same as the Republican does on abortion issues. But on everything else, not so much.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)of self-determination and privacy in their medical decisions.
SaintPete
(533 posts)I don't think the two are synonymous. I'm pro-life. I'm also pro-choice.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)They can be anti-abortion privately, but when they try to force their anti-women views on me, that's where I draw the line.
I'm anti-abortion because in my world, there are enough contraceptives out there to not warrant an abortion for me. But that's a personal choice and I understand other women don't live in my world. I'm pro-choice for my fellow Americans. I want them to have the freedom to choose what works best for them.
SaintPete
(533 posts)abti-abortion people don't really want to loose their right of choice. I support the individual's right to choose, even if I disagree with the choice.
Republicans and anti-choice folks are NOT Pro-life. They don't give a shit about "life" after birth.
thanks for getting it
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)Fuck-NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)shraby
(21,946 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)Did they support the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?
If they do or did they can't call themselves pro life.
What they are is an Anti choice candidate. They are not "pro" anything.
libodem
(19,288 posts)Decisions should be between the woman and her doctor. It's not just poor little 14 year olds that seek abortions. Some times it's the 5th or 6th child of an older working mother. Women need the right to decide the path of their own life. Keep religion out of my political arena or we'll be back to tax your church. America could use the extra cash for those anchor babies.
JohnnyRingo
(19,313 posts)He's the best we've had in my 40 year+ voting life, and as a devout Roman Catholic, he's pro-life. He doesn't do anything to promote the pro-life cause, but he doesn't run from his beliefs either.
I'll put Ryan's year in year out voting record up against nearly any congressman in the House.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Ryan_(politician)
mitchtv
(17,718 posts)I support any anti choicer. answer is NO
prairierose
(2,147 posts)and I never will. It demeans women and takes away their right to their own bodies.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)sarge43
(29,155 posts)that someone was on record and voted against all involvement in agressive wars, against the death penalty, voted for increasing taxes for social programs such as pre and post natal care, food banks, education, including college, etc.
If this person wants women to put their lives on the line, minimum s/he should risk their political career. However, I'm not holding my breath.
Gman
(24,780 posts)I'd have no problem supporting him/her. None whatsoever. Anybody stuck on one issue has got it too good.
Control-Z
(15,684 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)He loved Big Brother
(1,257 posts)Even poor health care coverage may not kill me as quickly as inability to have a safe abortion if I need one.
dembotoz
(16,922 posts)and she seems right on vitually every thing else
but i just can not wrap my arms around supporting her
just can't
Control-Z
(15,684 posts)Some issues have much greater consequences than others.
Happyhippychick
(8,422 posts)I see anyone who is against choice as against women and nothing will change my mind on that.
birkiboy93
(2 posts)I agree with that whole heartedly.
fightforfreedom123
(87 posts)I refuse.
That also means Ron Paul.
No. Any candidate recieving my support, especially a male, better respect women. And being pro choice is part of that respect.
dembotoz
(16,922 posts)in all clarity i must say
what was i thinking
no fucking way would i support this person
thank you for your help