Question: Is the fact that the men's group has a page for posting attractive women...
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Gormy Cuss (a host of the Feminists group).
Some sort of ambiguous, poorly executed attempt to subvert stereotype by reclaiming the stereotypical characteristics?
Or is it just a bunch of jackholes doing exactly what feminist and gender theory predicts?
I'm confused.
= new reply since forum marked as read
That's the least of what's offensive. Check out the threads about all the horrible women who falsely accuse men of rape. Or a recent fav, that women used a disproportionate burden of health resources because we bear children, evidence of yet another way that men are screwed over. Never mind that those kids are theirs as well. 
It really is hopeless. They aren't interested in understanding. They want to believe feminists are just prudes. It's easier for them that way. Essentially, they are a lost cause. I consider myself lucky if I can get through a day on this site without seeing women referred to as whores or sluts. Remember the demographic on this site is quite old so they weren't educated to think about gender. They assume everything about their current worldview is entirely natural--genetic--and have no concept of the economic and cultural factors that give rise to ideas of gender, race, and sexuality. The ones I find most disturbing are the female misogynists. I really have no patience whatsoever for them. Others in HOF are more understanding of what makes women that way than I am.
Edit: Just realized I'm not in HOF. Only recently put this group on my list.
I'll duck for incoming. 
men are, for some reason going eons back into time, visually stimulated in the mating business more than women. That's just a simple fact. Problems arise with how we deal with it.
Note that men are not the ones in five inch stillettos, Victoria's Secret bras and mascara. Or spending much money on hair care products. Well, most of us aren't. And also note that going back to ancient, and even prehistoric, times the art of the human body was often focused on sexual characteristics. Highly focused. Both sexes.
I'm not qualified to argue what all this means, but I can note that it exists and does have the effect of men noticing good looking women. We also notice the competition between women in this looking good business. Most of us realize that his is not done specifically for our benefit (I am in no way playing "blame the women"
but we are perfectly happy to take advantage of it as spectators. I might also note that most men don't find the stillettos, too heavy makeup, or excessively revealing clothing to be more attractive than less fashionable clothing. Many find them artificial and offputting. Especially if it makes you walk funny. Fashion photography, btw, is designed to put all these together into a fantasy look, so pushing it isn't as grotesque as it could be in real life.
While I readily admit that some men can be creepy, or outright pigs, dangerous even, I do have a problem with putting all this on men as if there is something going on that is entirely our fault. We did not invent microskirts, and even if a man did invent the bikini, nobody is forcing you to wear them. Wearing such clothing, or lack thereof, does not invite any sort of attack, of course, verbal or otherwise, but I don't understand complaints over our admiring the results of hot clothes, workouts, makeup and a little surgery on top of what you were born with.
