Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
Mon May 27, 2013, 01:09 AM May 2013

A proposal for moms-to-be

(like abortion rules, it’s for their own good)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-proposal-for-moms-to-be-like-abortion-rules-its-for-their-own-good/2013/05/24/5594f204-c3bd-11e2-9fe2-6ee52d0eb7c1_story.html

But while states give such solicitous attention to women planning to have an abortion, they ignore the needs of women planning to give birth. Bringing a child into the world is also a life-changing decision. Too many women have to make that choice without similar protections. It is time to demand equality and tell our legislatures to enact the Defense of Motherhood Act.

~snip~

To ensure that the decision to go through with a pregnancy is fully considered, there would be a 72-hour waiting period between the time a pregnant woman first sees a doctor and the time she can get prenatal care.

Physicians would have to inform pregnant women about the risks of childbirth and motherhood. They would have to note that childbirth, compared with abortion, is roughly 14 times more likely to result in maternal death and is more often associated with depression and other forms of mental illness. They would also have to emphasize that working women in the United States can expect to see their wages drop 9 to 16 percent for each child and that having a child makes it significantly less likely that an unmarried woman will ever marry.

To ensure that women are not being coerced by partners, family members or clergy into bearing a child, DOMA would require that all women be interviewed about the circumstances of conception and their motives for continuing with pregnancy. Did a husband sabotage birth control? Was a woman unable to afford contraception because her employer refused to comply with the Affordable Care Act?

~more at link~

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A proposal for moms-to-be (Original Post) LadyHawkAZ May 2013 OP
Thanks, LadyHawkAZ Kath1 May 2013 #1
Kick and Rec for JimDandy May 2013 #2
Not to omit that pregnant women have to consume healthy diets and take necessary no_hypocrisy May 2013 #3

Kath1

(4,309 posts)
1. Thanks, LadyHawkAZ
Mon May 27, 2013, 01:48 AM
May 2013

I thought that the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, when I was in 10th grade, meant that abortion was a legal option. Was I ever wrong!

Abortion should be safe, legal and affordable for every woman in this country. Period, end of story. No apologies, no excuses needed. It is the most intensely personal decision a woman can ever make. It should be her own decision, no one else's.

I was raised as a Catholic and I am a mother. And I am disgusted that we are still debating this issue in 2013.

no_hypocrisy

(48,813 posts)
3. Not to omit that pregnant women have to consume healthy diets and take necessary
Mon May 27, 2013, 06:31 AM
May 2013

supplements like folic acid and absorbable calcium for the duration of their pregnancy or face charges of endangerment of a child.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»A proposal for moms-to-be