Women's Rights & Issues
Related: About this forumThe Childcare Crisis Is Costing You Money
The Childcare Crisis Is Costing You Money
2/15/2023 by Michelle McCready and Wendy Chun-Hoon
Shanikia Johnson helps student Magjor Jones, 3, at Little Flowers Early Childhood and Development Center in Baltimore, Md., on Jan. 12, 2021. (Matt Roth / The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Lets imagine, just for a moment, a childcare and early learning system that has the public investment it truly needs. Our educators would be compensated fairly, their facilities supported and families would no longer struggle to afford and find high-quality programs for their children. Everyone connected to that strong childcare system would have more freedom to contribute to an even stronger economy. In early January, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics released its monthly Employment Situation Report. It found that while the nations unemployment rate ticked down in December 2022 and now sits at historically low levels, the labor force participation rateor the approximate percentage of the population who works or is actively seeking workremained stagnant and unchanged since the beginning of 2022. In fact, the U.S. labor force participation rate of 62.3 percent is well below most G20 countries.
The picture worsens for women. Their labor force participation lags that of men by more than 11 percentage points. For families, and especially mothers, available childcare can make a significant difference by increasing labor force participation, sustaining employment and achieving economic security. We read news articles almost daily about parents who want to work. They want to participate in the labor force, but cannot afford or find the childcare they need to hold down a job. Countless parents have told us how entire paychecks can be spent to meet the staggering price of childcare. Research supports what weve heard: In 2021, Child Care Aware of Americas (CCAoA) analyses showed that childcare prices increased by 5 percent.
. . . . .
Today, childcare is out of reach for families throughout the country. Whether its after-school care or full daycare for infants, childcare consumes a large share of family income among those who pay for childcare services. A new report by the Department of Labors Womens Bureau estimates the price of care represents between 8 and 19.3 percent of median family income per child. In addition, CCAoA has found childcare is significantly less affordable for single-parent households and households of color. Affordability is not the only concern; even if all families could afford childcare, the number of childcare slots available in the U.S. falls short of our nations needs. CCAoA determined that while 12.3 million children had all parents in the workforce in 2021, there were only 8.7 million licensed childcare slots available. Thats a 3.6 million-slot gap.
With high prices and high demand, some might think childcare providers are cashing in. This, however, is not the case. High-quality childcare is labor intensive and requires significant resources, which forces programs to operate on thin margins with childcare workers typically among the nations lowest paid workers. While childcare providers are the workforce behind the workforce, the national median wage for childcare workers is now around $13 per hour and most work without employer-provided health insurance or other benefits. Historically, childcare work isand has beendeeply undervalued. Public support for childcare is needed to truly compensate providers properly for the important work they do. Childhood educators are entrusted to prepare our childrenthe nations greatest resourcefor the future. Its time we recognize and treat early childhood educators like the professionals they are.
We must do more to increase our nations stagnant labor force participation rate. Childcare providers and the families who depend on them cannot continue to bear the burden of supporting our current system without additional support. Amid the pandemic, our nation made historic investments in childcare, and the recently signed government spending bill included additional money for states to fund childcare. As vitally important as these increases are, the U.S. childcare system needs to be radically transformed. Our nation must focus on creating a childcare system that is affordable, accessible and equitable in the long term.
https://msmagazine.com/2023/02/15/childcare-economy/
progree
(11,463 posts)Nationally, the labor force participation rate has been dwindling from a high point of about 67.3% in 2000 to 62.4% now (BLS's January report). (It was also 62.4% in March, so there hasn't been any progress in the past 10 months).
Labor force participation rate: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000
Labor force in thousands: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11000000
The labor force = employed + officially unemployed as per the BLS's monthly Household Survey
The officially unemployed are jobless people who have looked for work in the past 4 weeks (must be more than just looking at job listings). That's why they are counted as part of the labor force: either employed or actively looking for work. BTW, the officially unemployed is not a count of people claiming unemployment insurance, it has nothing to do with that (a common myth unfortunately).
How the Government Measures Unemployment http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm
# Labor Force Particpation Rate (age 16+) by gender
ALL: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000
Men: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300001
Women: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300002
# Labor Force Particpation Rate (prime age 25-54) by gender
All: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300060
Men: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300061
Women: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300062
niyad
(119,895 posts)progree
(11,463 posts)there are so many sectors of the economy where there are severe shortages of workers -- in comparing the prime age (25 - 54 yo) links to the corresponding "all" (age 16+) -- lots of us are aging out.
Covid-related is thought to have caused about a 1.5 percentage point drop all by itself, at least per one article I remember.