Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
LGBT
Related: About this forumCass Review author says leading medical org only supports trans health care under "political duress"
Cass Review author says leading medical org only supports trans health care under political duress
In a recent interview, Dr. Hilary Cass also ignored the many critiques of so-called rapid onset gender dysphoria.
By Mira Lazine Monday, May 13, 2024
In an interview with Azeen Ghorayshi of the New York Times published earlier today, Dr. Hilary Cass lead author on the highly controversial Cass Review examining gender-affirming care for trans youth took a both sides approach as to whether social acceptance or the widely discredited theory of social contagion causes people to come out as trans.
Social acceptance just doesnt happen that way, so dramatically, Cass told the Times. So that doesnt make sense as the full answer. But equally, those who say this is just social contagion are also not taking account of how complex and nuanced this is.
She went on to say that it only becomes a challenge if were medicalizing [gender], giving an irreversible treatment, for what might be just a normal range of gender expression.
The social contagion concept refers to the debunked concept of rapid-onset gender dysphoria (ROGD), a hypothesis originally promoted by Lisa Littman, who has since had her initial study on the topic retracted.
There is no evidence for ROGD, and the only advocates for it are notable anti-trans activists.
[...]
Cass also dismissed the position of expert organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), claiming that it is a fairly left-leaning organization and is politically motivated in what it chooses to support. The AAP is the leading medical organization for pediatricians in America, comprising over 67,000 doctors. It has previously advocated for mask mandates and vaccines and has argued for the safety of abortions.
[...]
More at link:
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2024/05/cass-review-author-says-leading-medical-org-only-supports-trans-health-care-under-political-duress/?utm_id=sidebar4&utm_term=image&utm_content=world
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 966 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cass Review author says leading medical org only supports trans health care under "political duress" (Original Post)
LostOne4Ever
May 2024
OP
LostOne4Ever
(9,597 posts)1. Sorry for Fixating so much on these Cass Review articles
Last edited Tue May 14, 2024, 04:43 PM - Edit history (2)
But as person who has a strong background in science and a person with their own issues with Gender and Gender Dysphoria it infuriates me to no end that this was done and that so little mainstream push back is being made against such a biased report!
How many medical organizations and professionals have to come out before the MSM sounds the alarm about this Bullshit?
From the article:
Additionally, Cass claims in the interview that she kept 58% of the evidence and did not dismiss anything for not being a randomized control trial. While this is technically true, it ignores points made by journalists and experts alike, such as a recent Mother Jones piece highlighting how the scale used to evaluate these studies is very subjective and explaining that her approach to evaluating study quality showed favoritism for studies critical of transgender care. A Twitter thread by journalist Lexi Koren also made detailed critiques of the reviews process.
Link to tweet
" target="_blank">link
]