LGBT
Related: About this forumTexas drag performers no longer focus of proposed ban on sexually oriented performances
Source: Austin American-Statesman
Texas drag performers no longer focus of proposed ban on sexually oriented performances
Ryan Autullo, Austin American-Statesman
Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:40 PM EDT·4 min read
Texas House members advanced legislation that would prohibit sexually oriented performances in front of children, but, notably, it was Democrats who saw it as a victory after getting language removed from the bill that specifically targeted drag performers.
The revised Senate Bill 12, approved on second reading Friday in the House, now carries a broader definition of impermissible conduct, threatening with a criminal offense any representation, actual or simulated, of a sex act in the presence of a person under 18. A drag performance would no longer be illegal unless that performance includes a sex act.
The concession reflects a win for drag performers, whove flooded the Capitol this legislative session to protest anti-drag proposals and tell lawmakers that nothing they do is inherently sexual.
In laying out the retooled bill Friday, Rep. Matt Shaheen, R-Plano, said the initial version of the bill previously approved in the Senate included an unnecessary reference to drag shows. He said the Senate's version might not hold up in court, citing little clarity on what acts fall under the ban.
-snip-
Read more: https://news.yahoo.com/texas-drag-performers-no-longer-184058532.html
getagrip_already
(17,436 posts)Wonder what this will mean for plays, couples in parks, and other venues where those under 18 will view "racy" heterosexual scenes.
It wasn't that long ago when kissing in public was illegal.
They are racing to the bottom.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)Oops, meant to reply to #1 ...
LostOne4Ever
(9,597 posts)We all lose our freedom and Liberty every time a RW evangelical brings their kid and must act in accordance to said RWers views.
That WILL BE used against the LGBTQ community almost exclusively and hardly ever enforced against cis-het people.
The only win I see is that it is not explicitly anti-lgbt
icymist
(15,888 posts)which is loosely defined by evangelical (so-called) Christians with an agenda.