Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
LGBT
Related: About this forumCalifornia Court Rules Nursing Home Employees Can Deadname Transgender Seniors
Source: KQED
California Court Rules Nursing Home Employees Can Deadname Transgender Seniors
KQED News Staff and Wires
Jul 20
LGBTQ rights advocates said Monday that they will seek to challenge an appeals court decision tossing out part of a California law designed to protect older LGBTQ residents in nursing homes.
The 2017 law is intended to protect against discrimination or mistreatment based on residents' sexual orientation or gender identity.
The Third District Court of Appeal overturned the part of the law barring employees of long-term care facilities from willfully and repeatedly using anything other than residents' preferred names and pronouns.
In other words, it was illegal for employees to intentionally misgender trans residents by using the names and pronouns they were assigned at birth, a practice known as deadnaming.
The ban on deadnaming violates employees' rights to free speech, the court ruled Friday.
-snip-
KQED News Staff and Wires
Jul 20
LGBTQ rights advocates said Monday that they will seek to challenge an appeals court decision tossing out part of a California law designed to protect older LGBTQ residents in nursing homes.
The 2017 law is intended to protect against discrimination or mistreatment based on residents' sexual orientation or gender identity.
The Third District Court of Appeal overturned the part of the law barring employees of long-term care facilities from willfully and repeatedly using anything other than residents' preferred names and pronouns.
In other words, it was illegal for employees to intentionally misgender trans residents by using the names and pronouns they were assigned at birth, a practice known as deadnaming.
The ban on deadnaming violates employees' rights to free speech, the court ruled Friday.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.kqed.org/news/11881770/california-court-rules-nursing-home-employees-can-deadname-transgender-seniors
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1474 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California Court Rules Nursing Home Employees Can Deadname Transgender Seniors (Original Post)
Eugene
Jul 2021
OP
The suit was filed by activists in an "unincorporated association" named Take Offense.
Eugene
Jul 2021
#5
In a general way, is there a "right" of healthcare workers to insult patients? n/t
Passenger
Jul 2021
#6
MLAA
(18,598 posts)1. The way I read this is nursing home residents could have to pay to have employees
Commit hate crimes against them.
This is bullshit
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)2. Truly an abomination...
Susan Calvin
(2,096 posts)3. This should apply to everybody.
Every person should have the right to be addressed the way they wish to be addressed. How would those nursing home employees feel if a resident made up a name for them and then insisted on calling them that?
Passenger
(217 posts)4. What is not clear from this story ...
... is the exact nature of the provoking incident.
It's still bad law in any case, but there's still the question of continuity of medical records?
If only there were some sort of unique identifier. A number perhaps.
Eugene
(62,646 posts)5. The suit was filed by activists in an "unincorporated association" named Take Offense.
Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener, who carried the law, said deliberately using the wrong name or pronoun is straight up harassment and erases an individuals fundamental humanity.
Rick Chavez Zbur, executive director of Equality California, which bills itself as the nations largest statewide LGBTQ civil rights organization, said using the wrong name and pronoun is a hateful act that denies someone their dignity and truth and can cause depression and even suicides.
Rick Chavez Zbur, executive director of Equality California, which bills itself as the nations largest statewide LGBTQ civil rights organization, said using the wrong name and pronoun is a hateful act that denies someone their dignity and truth and can cause depression and even suicides.
Also, referral by gender identity was only part of it.
The appeals court upheld a second challenged portion of the law prohibiting facilities or employees from assigning rooms based on anything other than a transgender residents gender identity.
https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/nursing-homes-can-deadname-transgender-seniors-court-rules-rcna1468
Taking Offense asserts that trans rights are "special rights" that discriminate against non-transgender persons.
https://www.gaycitynews.com/california-court-strikes-misgendering-ban-from-ltc-residents-bill-of-rights/
Passenger
(217 posts)6. In a general way, is there a "right" of healthcare workers to insult patients? n/t