Creative Speculation
Related: About this forumVideo of a controlled demolition of a Chineses high rise tower.
Something about this video looks familiar - maybe another case of deja vu.
FBaggins
(27,599 posts)They aren't similar at all.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)raining outward. Bad explosion control.
And not comparable to the visuals of the destruction of the NYC twin towers, if that's what you're referring to.
nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)Like this!
Not even the slightest bit. If you say so, it must be true.
William Seger
(11,031 posts)... must really, really not want to.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)just like it is here in the states - cool.
hack89
(39,179 posts)how about comparing apples to apples?
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)you commonly see in these controlled demolitions.
where have we seen that before?
William Seger
(11,031 posts)No explosives, just gravity destroying the buidings:
gyroscope
(1,443 posts)but it isn't shaped like a mushroom.
greyl
(22,996 posts)William Seger
(11,031 posts)The WTC collapses had a cloud of dust and debris plus smoke from the fires. But you're still pretending that you can't see (or hear) what's different about the Chinese demolition. After those rather obvious demolition charges that you can't bring yourself to see (or hear), the Chinese building also produces a cloud of dust and debris as gravity does the major part of the destruction. What's the same about all three examples is that the cloud of dust and debris in each case was the entire building. Duh. What's different about them is what initiated them.
BobbyBoring
(1,965 posts)As far as the sounds, a crew was there to record the video and audio. Most of the 9/11 video was shot from a distance without mike booms and things of that nature.