Exposing the fraud of 9/11 in 22 minutes

[wildbilln864]

[Cheap_Trick]

1. Odd, this post has been up over a month

Where's the usual assortment of deniers?

"Duuuur, Bush would never lie to us about this."

[superbeachnut]

2. debunked before watching - complied from the worse videos on 911 filled with lies and BS

No melted steel on 911. Guess the video has no clue what happened on 911, so it presents fantasy and lies dumbed down to fool a fringe few gullible people who can't think for themselves. This is the best 911 truth has.

5:39 the video lies and says no steel building has ever been destroyed by fire.
One Meridian Plaza, destroyed by fires fought.
Windsor Building, Spain, destroyed by fires fought.
WTC 1 and 2, destroyed by fires not fought.
WTC 7, destroyed by fires not fought.

I have never seen a building survive when fires are not fought.

But 911 truth lies, and this video has the dumbest claims from debunked videos - used to fool those who can't think for themselves.


When you find Alex Jones in a video, it becomes self-debunking, and of course is perfect dumbed down tripe to be in, creative speculation, even if it is dumber than dirt claims, quote mining journalists who think steel melted on 911. Why does a video quote mine errors to include as support for BS?

[gyroscope]

3. According to the 9/11 cover-up commission

each of the interior cores of the twin towers was "a hollow steel shaft," with no mention of the 47 central core columns contained in each tower. Boy what a credible report! They just lied outright about how the towers were constructed.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/core.html

WTH a hollow steel shaft!? Going by the official story, you would think the twin towers were the most shabbily, poorly built man-made structures in the history of the world that could be toppled by just backing a U-Haul into them.

[wildbilln864]

4. excellent points....

Last edited Wed Oct 22, 2014, 10:46 PM - Edit history (1)

which I see none of the usual members of the no-truth brigade have chosen to address.

[AZCat]

5. I'm not sure why you think it's necessary.

The 9/11 Commission Report, a non-technical report, was clearly superseded by the subsequent NIST reports, which were technical and contained considerably more accurate descriptions of the construction of the towers. If the powers-that-be were intent on lying to the general public, they did a pretty poor job.

[wildbilln864]

6. well there's some bullshit again.

Thanks for nothing.

[AZCat]

11. "Nothing" is what you call an actual reply?

It must be fascinating to live in your inverted universe.

[gyroscope]

7. To the contrary

the Bush-sponsored 9/11 commission, with the aid of the mainstream media,
did an excellent of spreading lies and propaganda about 9/11.

The NIST report was also filled with lies and inaccuracies, but the NIST report was largely irrelevant
because the mainstream media did not widely report on it and most people have not heard about it.

99.9% of what the general public knows about 9/11 comes from the shoddy 9/11 commission report.
The commission report is what was widely reported by the MSM. And the MSM made no attempt
to question or correct the innumerable inaccuracies and falsehoods it contained.

[William Seger]

8. And they killed Kenny

Saw it on YouTube.

[gyroscope]

9. Sorry charlie

but the twin towers were not a 'hollow steel shaft' as described by the 9/11 commission report.

the official story is a laughable fantasy.

[AZCat]

10. So no, you don't really have a point then.

Unless your point is that the only way you can defend the theories of the "truth movement" is by attacking the wrong document. Too bad we don't have a word to define this sort of behavior...