Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:37 PM Mar 2016

John Podesta and UFOs... disinformation agent.

As we know his last tweet when he left the Obama administration and then went to Hillary campaign was



However when he worked for Clinton they produced
a bullshit report that has been debunked on so many levels

The USAF Roswell report

http://www.roswellfiles.com/Articles/AirForceReport.htm

When he was there in Clinton's whitehouse so that should be a red flag on telling the truth.

Now Clinton was just on Kimel TV and was questioned too on UFOs she also said she would 'look into it'' as president.

Too qualify my background on this
The best man at my marriage was deputy director
for the US house of representative Science and Technology during the moon missions.

He told me once when he was drunk on good scotch
that within 5 years we would have anti gravity devices on the consumer level because he had seen things that were beyond top secret.

My Dad worked for the Joint Chiefs in the 60s for the USAF

Anyway...... I would like a discussion on Podesta and Clinton on this issue and why they are even talking about this.......disclosure....


From what I know now we are getting played by
forces you can't even conceive about.

Disclosure will not come from the government.






37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Podesta and UFOs... disinformation agent. (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 OP
Did John Podesta morph into Brian Deese? nt frogmarch Mar 2016 #1
I think this should raise bigger questions Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #2
Joke? Nope. frogmarch Mar 2016 #3
Care to give a link Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #4
Here's one: frogmarch Mar 2016 #6
He copied Podesta's you have nothing Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #8
I don't know why, and frogmarch Mar 2016 #11
I don't care if you need shit to prove UFO or not Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #14
I've read that both frogmarch Mar 2016 #25
Even if you are right and you are not Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #5
Another link: frogmarch Mar 2016 #7
What are you trying to say? Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #9
Now that I proved you wrong Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #10
You proved me wrong? frogmarch Mar 2016 #12
The timeline on the tweets Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #15
Apparently, frogmarch Mar 2016 #16
Podesta has been interviewed since that Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #18
It may have been a Twitter goof frogmarch Mar 2016 #21
So the 12 hour delay was real? Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #19
But you won't let me! frogmarch Mar 2016 #22
sure go ahead.......... this forum allows it Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #24
Nope again. frogmarch Mar 2016 #13
Unidentified flying objects are real Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #17
Still reading it. frogmarch Mar 2016 #20
Broad's timeline has been debunked Ichingcarpenter Mar 2016 #23
The Air Force didn't start the alien bodies rumor frogmarch Mar 2016 #26
I assume you think Podesta is not acting in good faith in calling for disclosure Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #27
Well it does raise some interesting conjectures on why Ichingcarpenter Apr 2016 #29
thanks for the express.co.uk link-- good stuff in there Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #30
I find your user name amusing LOL Ichingcarpenter Apr 2016 #31
yep, that's where I got it from Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #32
I think the Governor of New Mexico is the extraterrestrial, Hillary plans to expose Jeffersons Ghost May 2016 #37
another possibility is Podesta actually knows some real truths about UFOs Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #28
Would the President be Briefed on a UFO Special Access Program Ichingcarpenter May 2016 #35
yes, absolutely I agree-- it's all very true, and there are massive implications here Fast Walker 52 May 2016 #36
HRC talked about UFOs just recently on a radio show Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #33
Stanton Friedman talked about Hillary's UFO position Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #34

frogmarch

(12,223 posts)
3. Joke? Nope.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:24 PM
Mar 2016

I Googled to read the Tweet and every link I saw in search starting with "Finally, my biggest failure in 2014" was attributed to Deese.

The reason I Googled it was because I didn't know how much of your post was an excerpt from the Tweet (I don't do Twitter, so I am clueless about it) and how much of it was you speaking as you.

Nope, not a joke.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
8. He copied Podesta's you have nothing
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:54 PM
Mar 2016

Outgoing Obama Advisor John Podesta Has UFO Regrets

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/17/john-podesta-regrets-no-ufo-disclosure_n_6699646.html

any google search will prove you are incorrect


WHY WOULD HE DO THAT AND CAN YOU GET BACK ON TOPIC?

frogmarch

(12,223 posts)
11. I don't know why, and
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:05 PM
Mar 2016

you're the one who wanted me to furnish links.

Podesta's favorite TV show was The X-Files, or so one article on him stated. Figures. Just because he believes ETs are living among us, or that they've at least visited Earth a time or two, doesn't mean he's right. Let's have some evidence, and I'm not talking about documents and the like. I want to see a bona fide ET.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
14. I don't care if you need shit to prove UFO or not
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:11 PM
Mar 2016

I asked what is this about and why?



Can you not see that things are said for a reason on the national stage for a reason?

Think outside the box without your bias for a second if you can.

I don't care if you don't believe or I do

I'm asking why this is being promoted
by Hillary and Podesta on disclosure.


frogmarch

(12,223 posts)
25. I've read that both
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:08 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:24 PM - Edit history (2)

Bill and Hillary Clinton very much liked the movie Independence Day, but as I recall, they said it was because it showed the people of the world working together to fight off a common enemy. I don't recall either of the Clintons saying they believed ETs are visiting, or have visited Earth. Still, so what if Hillary has said she wants disclosure? If there are secret hidden UFO files, I agree - let's see them.

Oh, by the way, yes, it's true that test dummies weren't in use in 1947, but the Roswell rumors about alien bodies didn't start until something like 1970. To some people like my "Bradeen, th' dog's got the baby agin I tol you to tie it up - no, Bradeen, the baby" neighbor, who will continue to believe an alien craft crashed at Roswell and that alien bodies were removed and that the incident was covered up, facts don't stand a chance. To people like him, all official documents about UFOs are lies. To him, Truth is only what he wants it to be.

EDIT: I meant to include that in the 1950s, alien bodies rumors sprang up from pieced- together accounts of actual airplane crashes in which mangled human bodies were removed from the crashes and incidents involving test crash dummies that often looked way too real all burned and mangled. The human air crash victims/test crash dummies mixture had plenty of time to stew and become the Roswell alien bodies story. There were no crash dummies in 1947 when the Roswell incident reportedly happened, but by the mid-1970s, partly because of rumors or stories begun in the 40s that some of the crash dummies were really aliens!!!! the idea of aliens crashing on Earth was well established. It wouldn’t have taken much to come up with rumors of alien bodies being seen at Roswell.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
5. Even if you are right and you are not
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:38 PM
Mar 2016

Why would he do that on Podesta''s account?

So you are saying that Podesta's twitter account was highjacked by this guy?

So much for an intelligent conversation.......

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
9. What are you trying to say?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:59 PM
Mar 2016

The article says Podesta did

All that says is Deese repeating what Podesta said.

LOOk at the time stamp on Podesta's tweet and Deese tweet..........LOOk

Now get back to reality.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
10. Now that I proved you wrong
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:01 PM
Mar 2016

Answer some questions I addressed.

You seem to be a disinformation and re direction poster

frogmarch

(12,223 posts)
16. Apparently,
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:27 PM
Mar 2016

when Podesta stepped down and Deese filled his place, for some reason at least some of Podesta's tweets ended up on Deese's Twitter.

The former chief of staff for President Bill Clinton launched his White House Twitter account after joining the Obama administration early last year. Podesta left the administration in Feburary to lead Hillary Clinton’s upcoming campaign for president.

Since he left the White House, it appears that @podesta44 has morphed into the identity of his successor – @Deese44 – the handle for White House senior advisor, Brian Deese.


That puts Deese in the unfortunate situation of owning personal tweets from Podesta’s time in the White House, especially this widely publicized tweet about UFO’s:


I don't know if breitbart links are acceptable here, so I won't post the link. I suppose you'll say I made it up. Oh, well.


Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
19. So the 12 hour delay was real?
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:40 PM
Mar 2016

Since they are instantaneous when they are posted?

So is Bret bart saying its an obama conspiracy against Clinton's guys?

Now can you even get back to my subject?

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
24. sure go ahead.......... this forum allows it
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:56 PM
Mar 2016

But you still have not answered anything I directed on my OP.

frogmarch

(12,223 posts)
13. Nope again.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:10 PM
Mar 2016

Until a few years ago, I believed in UFOs, and I even posted here in this forum about them. I still like discussing them, but to be convinced nowadays that they're real, I'll need firm evidence.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
17. Unidentified flying objects are real
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:33 PM
Mar 2016

but that's not the point even if 90% are shit

which they are.

My point is ... why did this guy say this after
he knows the USAF roswell reports were bullshit

Did you read that they said the bodies that were reported on were
6 foot dummies on a program that happen 5 years later? Never mind the the mongol balloon story.

You know the records have been lost from the government on Roswell? According to the govt and FOIA inquires?

Which is why I find Podesta's stance as questionable.
when he was with Billy when the report came out.

But that is beside the conversation.

It still gets back to why is the Hillary campaign
promoting that they will do disclosure?

frogmarch

(12,223 posts)
20. Still reading it.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:43 PM
Mar 2016

Maybe you'd like to read this from my personal Save links:

http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/0624.html

I Want To Believe, Ichingcarpenter, but I need real evidence.

By the way, when I mention UFOs here, I mean ET UFO's, not simply unidentified flying objects.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
23. Broad's timeline has been debunked
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 05:54 PM
Mar 2016

as has his 6 foot dummies the airforce used.
when all witnesses reported child size beings.

Now can you address what I talked about?

frogmarch

(12,223 posts)
26. The Air Force didn't start the alien bodies rumor
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:34 PM
Mar 2016

or say the "alien bodies" at Roswell in 1947 were test dummies, 6 ft. test dummies or otherwise. As we both know, test dummies weren't in use until the 1950s. It was I Want To Believers talking it up that the Air Force said the "bodies" were probably test dummies.

Witnesses? lol

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
27. I assume you think Podesta is not acting in good faith in calling for disclosure
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 07:22 AM
Apr 2016

Which is quite possible. And if so, why?

Perhaps it's some sort of weird blackmail.

He's blackmailing the govt since HRC is an odds on favorite to win the WH.

Or someone is blackmailing him to do this.

Or maybe Podesta sincerely believes in disclosure.

Is it sure that Podesta had anything to do with the Clinton WH Roswell report?

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
29. Well it does raise some interesting conjectures on why
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 08:28 AM
Apr 2016

Both Hillary and Podesta have raised this into the public discourse.

What I've read and studied so far

1.This is a fairly good backstory on the Clintons and UFOs

http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/650737/What-REALLY-happened-when-Hillary-and-Bill-Clinton-tried-to-open-UFO-truths-21-years-ago
This goes into the Rockefeller connection and the book Hillary was reading back then.

2. At a 2005 speech in Hong Kong, Bill Clinton told about his efforts to look into the phenomenon:

“I did attempt to find out if there were any secret government documents that reveal things, and if there were, they were concealed from me, too. I wouldn’t be the first president that underlings have lied to or that career bureaucrats have waited out. But there may be some career person sitting around somewhere hiding these dark secrets, even from elected presidents. But, if so, they successfully eluded me, and I’m almost embarrassed to tell you I did try to find out.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/john-podesta-hillary-clinton-ufos_us_56d730c9e4b03260bf78f129

3. Podesta, I think may say he's for disclosure but
he's a small player getting played and playing some of the UFO crowd.

As far as the rest or truth?
I'll just say this



The deep State exists and manipulate those
who think they are in control but as Bill said
they won't let him know either

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
30. thanks for the express.co.uk link-- good stuff in there
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 11:30 AM
Apr 2016

Certainly it's interesting that they would raise the topic of UFOs since it is a topic typically sneered at or mocked by the MSM.... UFOs are probably fairly popular in the general public but it's not clear that the topic would help get votes, especially given the possible MSM backlash.

All very strange.


Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
31. I find your user name amusing LOL
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 11:45 AM
Apr 2016

Fastwalker


is a North American Aerospace Defense Command classification for Unidentified Flying Objects which enter or leave the atmosphere at a great velocity and which are sometimes captured on the Defense Support Program satellite system. These objects are generally attributed to man made objects of unknown origins and meteors.[1] Slower anomalous objects are referred to as "Slowwalkers"

Jeffersons Ghost

(15,235 posts)
37. I think the Governor of New Mexico is the extraterrestrial, Hillary plans to expose
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:10 PM
May 2016

Last edited Fri May 6, 2016, 11:03 AM - Edit history (1)

Only an extraterrestrial would support Donald Trump; and he'll probably offend them soonm. Donald Trump, the current GOP front-runner in election 2016, will select Susana Martinez, the governor of New Mexico, as his vice presidential running mate, assuming Trump wins the Republican nomination.
Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/2739987/meet-donald-trumps-vice-president-pick/#F6FIY528ggDobj2R.99

In a rewrite of this paragraph [combined with code derived from NSA arranged images; BTW, 99 Luft Balloons began playing, after I started writing this reply], I will expose Chinese agents, sent to copy files from my computer, while searching for code.

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
28. another possibility is Podesta actually knows some real truths about UFOs
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 07:58 AM
Apr 2016

and is threatening in an indirect way that he will spill the truth unless HRC wins the WH.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
35. Would the President be Briefed on a UFO Special Access Program
Sun May 1, 2016, 02:58 AM
May 2016

In 1976 presidential candidate Jimmie Carter promised the American people that he would open any government UFO files that might exist. Recall that while governor of Georgia, Carter had a UFO sighting and actually filed a report. After winning election to President, Carter met with CIA Director George H. W. Bush seeking a briefing on the topic. Bush turned him down, claiming that neither as President nor as Commander-in-Chief did he have a "need to know." Once in office Carter turned to NASA for information, directing presidential science advisor Frank Press to ask NASA administrator Robert Frosch to "form a small panel of inquiry" to investigate the UFO situation. This letter and other correspondence may be found in "UFOs and NASA" (Journal of Scientific Exploration, pp. 93--142, 1988). Nothing at all came of this as recounted by Richard C. Henry -- then a young astrophysicist (now a prominent Johns Hopkins professor) working as a deputy to the director of what was the Astrophysics Division at NASA headquarters -- on whose desk this "hot potato" request landed. For five months NASA went through some amusing twists and turns, recounted by Henry, before politely declining.

Discounting the NASA farce, and assuming that any possible UFO program would exist as a Special Access Program in the Department of Defense, on what legal basis would the President and Commander-in-Chief be denied access?

It is likely that the UFO topic is actually classified by one or more laws duly enacted by Congress in the late 1940s concerning national security -- but without any overt reference to UFOs of course -- and signed by President Truman. Only a handful of members of Congress, if any at all, would have known that more than Cold War issues were involved in this far-reaching national security legislation enacted at a time of near panic over a Soviet nuclear threat. There are at least two bins into which the UFO topic could have been placed such that a future President could not unilaterally release it (legally) or, in fact, maybe even know about it. One bin is the category of Restricted Data (RD) established by the Atomic Energy Act in 1946 and pertains to Special Nuclear Material (SNM); another bin would be what has since evolved into the Waived Special Access Program system set up under the authority of the National Security Council which traces back to the National Security Act signed by Truman in 1947 (interestingly only a couple of weeks after the Roswell episode).

That means that even if an incoming President asked someone who knew about the existence of such a program, that individual would be required by law to not only not tell the President, but also to actively mislead him, if necessary. (Such a policy is actually spelled out in controversial documents that researchers Ryan and Robert Wood obtained and traced back to CIA Director Allen Dulles in the 1950s. The source of these documents is unclear.) If a president today tried the same thing without the appropriate clearances (which he could not give to himself) he would likewise be told (legitimately) that there was nothing disclosable. If this hypothesis is correct, then UFO information would be "Born Secret" by the Atomic Energy Act, and not releasable to anyone without at least an AEC "Q" clearance (and likely higher, R or above), plus a legitimate need to use it in his/her job. By law, all RD is "owned" by the AEC Commissioner at its inception. The AEC clearance standards are somewhat different than executive branch standards. In order to grant a Q or higher clearance, the Commissioner must find that the applicant is of "good moral character," among other things. Thus, if the Commissioner didn't like Richard Nixon's burglary at the Watergate Hotel, or Bill Clinton's dalliances, the Commissioner could withhold access to RD even on those grounds.

A new President who wants to know what the government knows about UFOs would have to be persistent, clever, and informed before beginning the quest, as Clinton's failed attempt via Associate Attorney General Webster Hubble attests. Simply issuing a presidential executive order declassifying the topic might yield the mistaken conclusion that there is no such material. The first step would be to determine under exactly what legal jurisdiction the matter is classified. This could best be accomplished by a small dedicated research team reporting directly and personally to the President with at least high enough clearances to be able to read all classified Presidential Decision Memoranda and the classified appendices to the Atomic Energy Act and the National Security Act.

http://www.ufoskeptic.org/president.html


Dolan earlier writing on Disclosure


. Disclosure is a pandora’s box with a panoply of taboo topics just waiting to spring out. It is, as one friend of mine calls it, “a sloppy tar-baby,” a threatening, friendly, frightening, and inseparable bundle of unavoidable eventualities.

So I can imagine a few questions, even from a media as compliant as the American. “Mr. President,” one correspondent might say, “what are the intentions of these aliens?” Or, “Mr. President, what does this say about the claims of alien abduction? Are they real, after all?” Or how about, “Mr. President, what about claims of underground alien bases? Or claims of secret possession of alien technology?”

These questions might not arise immediately. But they would arise eventually. Once you open that lid, it will be very difficult to control the outcome. The answers would not be pretty.

For this reason, I doubt that disclosure will come from America’s political establishment. But there are always other countries. There are always the aliens. The truth is already here; it’s simply waiting to land.

After all, what exactly are the secret keepers protecting? Let’s see. Power, wealth, control, their plans for the future, access to information, underground bases already built, the status quo.

But there must be more. How about communication with aliens? Worm hole technology? Access to our genetic code? Or any number of technologies that we have not even begun to discuss openly in our society. Remember the statement of an Area 51 insider to aerospace journalist James Goodall – this was back in the 1980s – “we have things in the Nevada desert that would make George Lucas envious.” In other words, Star Wars technology.

Can you imagine the front page of the New York Times following a true disclosure of all this? “MASSIVE COVERUP EXPOSED.” The biggest journalistic fiasco in history would finally be acknowledged, wholesale resignations would sweep the intelligence community, a political third party would do a clean sweep of Washington. Congress would promise emergency hearings, Arab oil nations would be in a state of collapse as oil price futures plummet, and the stock market would be in a headlong tailspin.

People would realize that a massive power structure has existed for generations, and has siphoned away trillions of dollars. They would learn that it has played a dominant, though unacknowledged, role in shaping their lives.

Think about NASA and the space shuttle program. There are no shortage of quiet discussions about the antiquated nature of NASA’s shuttle technology. Astronauts have died because better technology was denied to them. And that is merely the tip of the iceberg, for this issue goes far beyond NASA.


No, people wouldn’t be pleased or especially understanding. Heads would roll.

The American system of government, as it has come to exist, and by extension American society, and by extension our current global civilization, is not compatible with true UFO disclosure. Disclosure would rip it all away.

You might argue that this would be a good reason to maintain the secrecy. On the other hand, I would argue it’s the best reason for disclosure.

http://www.richarddolanpress.com/#!ufo-secrecy-and-the-death-of-american/c1pce

So as far as Podesta and Hillary claim on disclosure goes, its a hype, a Window Dressing for her false openness, hell just release her banking transcripts which she won't do but she will release all the UFO stuff? Are we really buying this spill? I'm not.


Besides 66% of the DOD today are private contractors which legally don't have to reveal anything, anyway to anyone so if there is a UFO connection, and evidence points there is with internal government memos from the 50s, 60s, 70s and very early 80s, acquired through FOIA shows a forensic pattern of government awareness of this unexplained phenomenal and their concern about it. Hillary nor any president can access the deep vault even if they wanted to and naive for anyone to buy the story that they could.

So the question is.......... what is really going on?

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
36. yes, absolutely I agree-- it's all very true, and there are massive implications here
Sun May 1, 2016, 07:49 AM
May 2016

the only real conclusion is that there is some very deep stuff being hidden from us, and probably some very disturbing truths about humanity and the future of our planet.

Meanwhile, the vast majority of people just don't give a shit or poo-poo the very clear evidence of all this.

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
34. Stanton Friedman talked about Hillary's UFO position
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:31 PM
Apr 2016
http://podcastufo.com/podcast/199-free-show-stanton-friedman/

and makes a good point: her claim of wanting UFO disclosure but only if it doesn't harm national security is pretty much meaningless, since by definition, admitting UFOs/aliens are real will violate national security.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»John Podesta and UFOs... ...