Federal judge strikes down latest version of Iowa 'ag-gag' law
DES MOINES, Iowa (CN) A federal judge in Des Moines held Monday that the latest version of Iowa so-called ag-gag law aimed at preventing animal rights groups and journalists from video recording conditions in livestock facilities violates the First Amendment.
U.S. District Judge Stephanie Rose granted the animal rights groups motion for summary judgment, saying Iowas state law threatening criminal penalties for trespassing on livestock facilities property for purposes of recording evidence of animal abuse violates free speech rights.
It is true that the Act does not prohibit the editing, publication, or distribution of recordings or photographs on trespassed property, Rose wrote in reference to Iowas law. But it restricts the capture of such recordings or photographs, rendering the remaining steps in the protected video production process impossible. The act of recording is a necessary predicate to produce this protected speech and is protected under the First Amendment.
The complaint was filed last year by the Animal Legal Defense Fund, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and three other groups.
It is past time for the animal agriculture industry to acknowledge that consumers do not want to support an industry that is cruel to animals and Iowa cannot infringe on our constitutional rights in order to hide abuse, Animal Legal Defense Fund Executive Director Stephen Wells said in a statement released Monday. The state of Iowa continues to fail in its efforts to prohibit whistleblowers and undercover investigators from exposing the inhumane treatment of animals, worker safety concerns, and food-safety issues in factory farms and slaughterhouses.
https://www.courthousenews.com/federal-judge-strikes-down-latest-version-of-iowa-ag-gag-law/
https://www.farmsanctuary.org
jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)The first amendment guarantees free speech, press freedoms and the right to violently attack congress with confederate battle flag poles. Wait a minute......1A does not protect the right to violently attack congress. Carrying battle flags, okay. It looks like there are PTB trying to confuse the first amendment in the minds of people.
It also guarantees the right to take photos of cows and pigs. So, there you are.
duhneece
(4,250 posts)Duppers
(28,248 posts)TY for posting this.