Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Metro's soaring pension costs threaten future service, federal report says
Transportation
Metros soaring pension costs threaten future service, federal report says
By Faiz Siddiqui and Robert McCartney
September 10 at 7:03 PM
Metros rising pension costs threaten its future operating position, potentially hampering its ability to provide service if the agency fails to rein in unfunded retirement and health-care liabilities, according to a report from the Government Accountability Office released Monday.
The 53-page report raises concerns about Metros nearly $3 billion in unfunded retirement and health-care costs, and notes that its $4.7 billion in total pension liabilities represents about 6.5 times what the agency spends annually on salaries and wages.
Metros annual pension costs grew by an average of nearly 19 percent from 2006 to 2017, the federal report said, making pensions the agencys fastest-growing workforce cost as its total labor costs grew about 3 percent a year.
With the scale of the obligations, the report posits that in the event of an unfavorable financial market, Metro could be backed into a corner to cover its obligations. The scale of the pension liabilities means that a drop of less than one percentage point in Metros investment return on its pension fund could squeeze its operating budget to the point that the agency would need to reduce service or ask the jurisdictions that fund it to cover the shortfall.
....
Faiz Siddiqui is a reporter with The Washington Post's transportation team. His coverage includes Metro, Uber and Lyft. Follow https://twitter.com/faizsays
Robert McCartney is The Washington Posts senior regional correspondent, covering government and politics in the greater Washington area. Follow https://twitter.com/McCartneyWP
Metros soaring pension costs threaten future service, federal report says
By Faiz Siddiqui and Robert McCartney
September 10 at 7:03 PM
Metros rising pension costs threaten its future operating position, potentially hampering its ability to provide service if the agency fails to rein in unfunded retirement and health-care liabilities, according to a report from the Government Accountability Office released Monday.
The 53-page report raises concerns about Metros nearly $3 billion in unfunded retirement and health-care costs, and notes that its $4.7 billion in total pension liabilities represents about 6.5 times what the agency spends annually on salaries and wages.
Metros annual pension costs grew by an average of nearly 19 percent from 2006 to 2017, the federal report said, making pensions the agencys fastest-growing workforce cost as its total labor costs grew about 3 percent a year.
With the scale of the obligations, the report posits that in the event of an unfavorable financial market, Metro could be backed into a corner to cover its obligations. The scale of the pension liabilities means that a drop of less than one percentage point in Metros investment return on its pension fund could squeeze its operating budget to the point that the agency would need to reduce service or ask the jurisdictions that fund it to cover the shortfall.
....
Faiz Siddiqui is a reporter with The Washington Post's transportation team. His coverage includes Metro, Uber and Lyft. Follow https://twitter.com/faizsays
Robert McCartney is The Washington Posts senior regional correspondent, covering government and politics in the greater Washington area. Follow https://twitter.com/McCartneyWP
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1264 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Metro's soaring pension costs threaten future service, federal report says (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Sep 2018
OP
PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,727 posts)1. Not bothering to fund pensions
is a time-honored tradition in both the public and private sector, alas.
Pensions are being cut in so many places, completely devastating people who did exactly what they were supposed to: worked at the same job for twenty or thirty years or more, who were promised a decent pension and often retirement health benefits.
People trash 401k plans and the like, but it you put the money aside, and invest in a diversified portfolio, you'll probably wind up better off than with a pension that suddenly disappears or is cut by two-thirds or more.
MichMan
(13,167 posts)2. Time to start raising fares substantially