Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onpatrol98

(1,989 posts)
Wed Dec 14, 2011, 07:51 PM Dec 2011

What is the most environmentally sound way to handle baby poop?

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Hutzpa (a host of the Frugal and Energy Efficient Living group).

Seriously...what kind of diapers do you use or don't use?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What is the most environmentally sound way to handle baby poop? (Original Post) onpatrol98 Dec 2011 OP
cloth diapers gejohnston Dec 2011 #1
Cloth was the only one I could think of also... onpatrol98 Dec 2011 #2
I'm too old to have recent experience, so cloth diapers are all I know. Curmudgeoness Dec 2011 #3
The Great Disposable Diaper Debate kristopher Dec 2011 #4
The water usage might become the most important factor in years to come txlibdem Dec 2011 #5
Post removed Post removed Dec 2011 #6

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
1. cloth diapers
Wed Dec 14, 2011, 11:51 PM
Dec 2011

the down side is the cleaning.

onpatrol98

(1,989 posts)
2. Cloth was the only one I could think of also...
Thu Dec 15, 2011, 12:08 PM
Dec 2011

Cloth was the only thing that came to mind for me, too. It just seems like someone would have thought of another alternative and marketed it. I mean...the average family with children must go through boatloads (another word came to mind) of diapers.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
3. I'm too old to have recent experience, so cloth diapers are all I know.
Thu Dec 15, 2011, 06:57 PM
Dec 2011

The up side: They are reuseable. They do last a long time. They force you to change the baby more often, which is better for the baby. Kids will often toilet train easier because the diaper is not comfortable, while the disposables keep moisture away from the baby. It keeps all those diapers out of the landfill. And really, have you ever seen the goop that is inside a diaper??? No, I don't mean the baby's mess, I mean the gel that the diapers are made of---scary. I saw a disgarded diaper that had broke open and that gel was disgusting---it looks like a hazardous material to me.

The down side: They are labor intensive, with rinsing and washing. You will use a lot more of these diapers because you cannot leave a baby in a wet diaper---and especially newborns will be going through them often. They do not wick moisture away from the baby (hence the changing more often). The rinsing and washing uses water---and I have heard some environmentalist who are opposed to cloth for this reason. I suppose that it depends on whether you are living in an area with water issues or not on this one. Although I consider myself an environmentalist also, I don't have a problem with water use, since the water can be reused after treating while a landfill will be there forever---or close to it.

It all comes down to what your comfort level is. Don't let yourself be forced into using one or the other diaper. Consider your time and what you can do.

And the most environmentally sound way would be to let the baby be naked all the time, if you ask me. I guess that wouldn't work well inside a house!

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
4. The Great Disposable Diaper Debate
Sat Dec 17, 2011, 02:31 PM
Dec 2011

The Great Disposable Diaper Debate

What's an environmentally conscious parent to do? To save the earth she or he forswears disposable diapers, finds a diaper service or does a lot of laundry, and feels righteous. Then along comes the shocking news that reusable diapers might be as bad for the environment as disposables.

I kid you not. When the idea first surfaced it was ignorable, because it came from Procter & Gamble (which shares with Kimberly Clark most of the nation's $3.2 billion disposable diaper market). The company hired a consulting firm to compare the impacts of both kinds of diapers -- not only the landfilling bulk of disposables, but the water and energy demands of washables. The report concluded, "Neither product is clearly superior in all of the resource and environmental impact categories considered."

Ignorable, as I said, until that conclusion was seconded by no less an environmental hard-liner than Allen Hershkowitz of the Natural Resources Defense Council. He compiled data from all sources (the cotton manufacturers did their own counter-study) on the complete paths from cotton gin to diaper to washing machine, and from plastic factory to diaper to dump. He writes, "Disposables consume more raw materials and produce more solid waste ... but cloth diaper production and use consume more water and energy and produce more ... atmospheric emissions and waste water effluent."

Personally I'm not convinced. I'm glad the question has risen, because cradle-to-grave (oil-well-to-dump) impact analyses are exactly what we need to make responsible consumer decisions. But this example shows how difficult it is to do those analyses right.

Here are some of the facts of the case...

http://www.sustainer.org/dhm_archive/index.php?display_article=vn321diapersed

txlibdem

(6,183 posts)
5. The water usage might become the most important factor in years to come
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 07:58 AM
Dec 2011

As global climate change will bring multi-year droughts in areas formerly water-rich.

Response to onpatrol98 (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Frugal and Energy Efficient Living»What is the most environm...