Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

caraher

(6,308 posts)
Mon Jun 3, 2024, 09:25 AM Jun 2024

Hiding behind hydrogen

A bit over a year old, but a good summary of the current role of hydrogen as an energy carrier in the economy.

When you zoom in on hydrogen’s “colours,” however, they appear slippery. The hydrogen economy is not a palette of technological options but a grey-brown oil refinery behind an eye-catching blue-green front gate. All the chatter is of the latter.

Green and blue hydrogen yield 11 million and 320,000 Google hits respectively, as against 95,000 for grey and 49,000 for brown. The reality curves in the opposite direction: only 0.04 per cent of hydrogen is green, and blue hydrogen is also less than one per cent. At least 96 per cent is grey or brown, most of which is used in oil refineries and for manufacturing ammonia and methanol.

?itok=39MVygxy
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hiding behind hydrogen (Original Post) caraher Jun 2024 OP
Sorry But I'm missing the point of this post. flashman13 Jun 2024 #1
The point is that current hydrogen hype misrepresents reality caraher Jun 2024 #3
It's a polite way of saying that the use of hydrogen... hunter Jun 2024 #4
Yes! We absolutely need to scale up the GREEN H2 industry... Think. Again. Jun 2024 #2

hunter

(38,941 posts)
4. It's a polite way of saying that the use of hydrogen...
Mon Jun 3, 2024, 01:16 PM
Jun 2024

...as a fuel, or for energy transmission, or as an energy storage medium, is largely a scam, one promoted by the same fossil fuel industry that wants you to believe carbon capture is a viable and important technology.

I'm not so nice. I started thinking about hydrogen as a fuel and doing the math more than forty years ago. I knew personally some of the early promoters of hydrogen fuel. I couldn't make the math work then, and I can't make it work now.

It's not a simple technical problem that can be solved with more engineering -- it has to do with the thermodynamic and physical properties of hydrogen itself.

If you've got an economical carbon-free source of hydrogen, say from a high temperature nuclear reactor running a sulfur-iodine cycle, it's best to use that hydrogen to synthesize nitrogen fertilizers and much easier-to-handle conventional fuels.

There were people who believed human powered ornithopters would be as common as bicycles in the 21st century. Why not?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Hiding behind hydrogen