Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
Mon Jul 21, 2014, 05:46 AM Jul 2014

Here's why they REALLY want to end teacher tenure.

And no, folks, it really isn't that complicated. From Arthur Goldstein, active NYC Teacher and inveterate blogger. Via NY Daily News.

Reposted from GD: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025268349


>>>>Every day, it seems, I read about a new lawsuit to do away with teacher tenure. The crusade reminds me of my friend Harris Lirtzman. It’s because of tenure that I teach and he doesn’t.

Harry used to be a deputy New York State controller until, in 2009, he decided to become a math teacher of special-education students in the Bronx. He offered experience and a depth of understanding few could match — but his discerning eye proved to be his downfall.

He studied the kids’ Individualized Education Programs, the documents that state what services special-education students require, and discovered that many were being underserved, possibly to save on school expenses.

Harry began asking questions — and learned exactly how unwelcome they were when, in December 2011, he was denied tenure.

Harry now tutors at-risk students in Yonkers. If he’d had tenure, he’d still be helping city public school kids.
(link to Lirtzman story in NY Times:http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/22/nyregion/punished-for-helping-special-education-students.html?_r=0)

Without tenure, I’d probably be in Harry’s place. I teach English as a second language, usually to beginners, at Francis Lewis High School in Fresh Meadows, Queens.

One year, I had two students who spoke English but couldn’t read or write. One had been kicking around city schools for years.

He had a strategy for pushy teachers like me. He listened intently and participated orally as much as possible>>>>>
the rest at: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/teacher-tenure-good-apples-article-1.1868064

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's why they REALLY want to end teacher tenure. (Original Post) Smarmie Doofus Jul 2014 OP
It's the drive to bring back serfdom and slavery Demeter Jul 2014 #1
A week or so ago I might have said this was a bit simplistic. Smarmie Doofus Jul 2014 #4
Poor Harry didn't follow Rule #1 for noobs. femmocrat Jul 2014 #2
He says when he explained what was happening to him to people who did NOT work in the system.... Smarmie Doofus Jul 2014 #5
Add Van Roekel to that list. femmocrat Jul 2014 #6
But, but jobz for lifeee!!!11 Starry Messenger Jul 2014 #3
Arthur Goldstein blogs here, BTW: Smarmie Doofus Jul 2014 #7
He also tweets a lot....link. madfloridian Jul 2014 #8
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
1. It's the drive to bring back serfdom and slavery
Mon Jul 21, 2014, 06:45 AM
Jul 2014

It isn't about education at all. Education isn't on the radar or the shopping list. If they didn't have to spend a dime on education, they couldn't be happier. Because, in their minds, education is bad.

It's SICK SICK SICK.

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
4. A week or so ago I might have said this was a bit simplistic.
Mon Jul 21, 2014, 11:03 AM
Jul 2014

>>> It's the drive to bring back serfdom and slavery>>>>>

I've been watching an old PBS Series on DVD this week: The Roman Empire: First Century AD.

Conclusion: your characterization is NOT simplistic. The essence of it is .... and naturally it's all dressed up in rhetorical ruffles and flourishes....this is EXACTLY what it is:

>>> It's the drive to bring back serfdom and slavery>>>>>>>>

Essentially the history of the world since Tiberius. ( And probably *before*.)

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
2. Poor Harry didn't follow Rule #1 for noobs.
Mon Jul 21, 2014, 07:55 AM
Jul 2014

Keep your head down and stay out of sight. And never ask questions.

Another loss for our once-proud profession.

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
5. He says when he explained what was happening to him to people who did NOT work in the system....
Mon Jul 21, 2014, 06:20 PM
Jul 2014

... they thought Harry had to be making it up.

When he spoke to veteran teachers, it was like.... "Yeah... well .... but did anything *unusual* happen?"

And believe me.... this is a guy who's been around the block.

Which begs the question: why do we stand for this?

Union leaders like Weingarten and Mulgrew can't make up their mind over how quickly they want to give up on tenure.

The unions have got it ASS BACKWARDS. They should be framing the issues as: "How can we make tenure STRONGER?"

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
6. Add Van Roekel to that list.
Mon Jul 21, 2014, 06:43 PM
Jul 2014

I think they are more interested in keeping their high-profile positions than in fighting for teachers' rights. PSEA couldn't roll over fast enough for value-added assessment for teachers.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
8. He also tweets a lot....link.
Tue Jul 22, 2014, 01:23 AM
Jul 2014
https://twitter.com/TeacherArthurG

Ah, those "discerning eyes" that teachers can only have with tenure. Trouble is even with tenure, which I now call due process.....life can be miserable for those who speak out.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»Here's why they REALLY wa...