Men's Group
Related: About this forumWhat is masculinity?
Over the years, many threads have erupted in various groups (often if not usually authored and driven by women) attempting to define what masculinity is. My typical response is something like "that's not it, and besides men are the only ones with the moral authority to create that definition".
... but in fairness, there hasn't been much progress in that regard. Perhaps it isn't enough to say that the definitions offered are wrong, if we can't create and agree upon some parameters which might be right.
First up, I suppose should be the concept of aggression and violence. I'm perfectly prepared to exercise both aggression and violence in the protection of the community and those less able to defend themselves, so I think the term is being loaded with inappropriate negative connotations. After all, the term for a person unwilling to do so is coward.
I suggest some others;
- service to causes transcending self
- fidelity and consistency to a vision and a moral code
- willingness to take calculated risk
- leadership
- strength (especially of principles, i.e. work ethic)
- accepting responsibility for one's actions and role
- extending and expecting respect, but not necessarily unconditional.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)not being afraid of your testosterone
not giving a shit if other people are because they are less than you
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Masculinity is a rhetorically constructed set of cultural rules and imposed norms for people with penises. Some of these rules change every so many years.
In the US, some of these rules include:
1. Provide for your family.
2. Protect your family from outside attackers.
3. Eschew the feminine.
4. Love having sex with women.
5. Don't be too affectionate with other adult males.
6. Enjoy the right sports. Football is right, couples figure skating is not right.
Plus lots of others.
Should we, or anyone, create that definition? Many of myths we live by, such as "the people" and intuitional authority, definitely have their uses, but what use is the myth of masculinity in today's world? Perhaps we should just let that myth go, as opposed to reconstructing it.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)If you're a man and inclined to accept that men tend toward masculine and that "masculine" is a set of negative character traits
...no good comes from it.
I don't accept these three statements together.
Men tend to be masculine
Society defines masculinity
The consensus markers of masculinity are bad things
In fact, I only accept the first statement.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Men tend to be masculine
Society defines masculinity
The consensus markers of masculinity are bad things
In fact, I only accept the first statement.
The first statement seems really simple and obvious, but my brain is making it really complex for some reason. Perhaps I am having a hard time with it because masculinity is so subjective that I think the statement can mean many different things.
The second statement is difficult for me because we have not agreed upon what masculinity actually is. In my view, masculinity is rhetorical, so it is defined by individuals, all conscious humans with a concept of masculinity, and by our language.
I believe "bad" comes from the observer, as opposed to the thing/situation being observed, so I also deny the third statement, but my reasons may be different than yours.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Not unlike say, "Muslim". If a person self-identifies as muslim, I think it's primarily incumbent on them to define (especially, but not entirely*, for themselves) what that means.
Some negatively-disposed outside observer might think "muslim" roughly translates to "woman-hating terrorist", but their opinion shouldn't be internalized by muslims generally, because one of three things will occur to those who accept external authority to define the term.
a) it becomes either a self-perpetuating view or
b) a source of self esteem problems for those who want to continue to be muslim but aren't woman-hating terrorists, or
c) it compels moderates Muslims to abandon the faith
I think we've seen this with the term "liberal" and the negative connotations that conservatives have effectively applied to it. Radical liberals want to raise taxes to x% without really worrying overmuch about how much government we really need. Traditional liberals now call themselves "progressives" to avoid the implications of "liberal", and many, many people who hold traditionally liberal (i.e. JFK liberal) views are openly hostile to the term (i.e. "keep your government hands off my Social Security"
When you initially responded to the question, fully half of the defining markers you provided were negative. In my humble opinion, this is exactly what happened to liberals who internalized the definitions provided by others and decided that they weren't actually liberals but were instead "progressives".
The thing is, "progressives" are still vulnerable to the ongoing demonization of the new and improved term.
Back to "masculine". Men have jumped from "masculine" to "chivalrous" to "gentleman" to "feminist" to "feminist ally" in a vain attempt to keep up with social convention as each is denigrated out from under them. I suggest that the very act of doing this is to surrender the primary defining marker of virtuous of masculinity; fidelity to ones principles, even at tangible personal cost.
"not entirely" to me means accepting that others are going to have views but that they're not entitled to be treated as if their view is either valid or correct or acceptable.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)#1 is a mixed bag.
#2... Well, we had some racoons on the back porch that I chased off not too long ago. Does that count?
#3 requires a definition of "femininity", too, doesn't it?
#5. Meh. I'm not exactly a people person, but that applies to everyone.
#6 Don't give a shit about any sports. Which is funny, because I'm fairly athletic. Maybe it ties back into being a misanthrope.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I suppose I should be glad they just stole the cat food, and didn't try to take my car.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)They skulk back to their no-goodnik lair and tell their buddies which neighborhoods to avoid.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)I plan on replying to your other reply; I just wanted to think its philosophical implications first.
Response to ZombieHorde (Reply #2)
radicalliberal This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to ZombieHorde (Reply #2)
radicalliberal This message was self-deleted by its author.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)" - service to causes transcending self
- fidelity and consistency to a vision and a moral code
- willingness to take calculated risk
- leadership
- strength (especially of principles, i.e. work ethic)
- accepting responsibility for one's actions and role
- extending and expecting respect, but not necessarily unconditional. "
I guess I'm trying to contrast that with femininity, and what that list would look like.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)I don't think I have standing to create that list.
Anecdote time. In the first season of The West Wing, Leo McGarry, the president's chief of staff is told by his wife that she's dissatisfied by the amount of attention he pays to her; "Your job is not as important as your marriage!", to which he replies, "yes my job is more important than my marriage".
I think that anecdote does illustrate a difference between masculinity and femininity. Both approaches might be adult characteristics, but they are in irreconcilable conflict.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)None of those traits are exclusively male, nor would I expect them to be.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)in the definition, as much as i do not define masculinity. though i do know what it is not.
no, i do not think women have exclusive roles any more than i think men do. hence, me not getting all this defining we are so busy trying to do.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)If you believe that women tend toward the feminine, then it behooves individual women to internalize a personal definition of feminine that encompasses a set of positive character traits.
I think it's unhealthy for men to internalize a laundry list of negative connotations of masculinity, and in fact delegate to someone else the authority to make that definition.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)that has equally if not more, raised your boys? that it is a role of woman. and you follow behind without much credit or validity in that role?
man. my brothers would not.
any more than i would take a back seat to my abilities in leadership roles, or moral roles or anything else on your list.
BUT... i am absolutely right there with you in not allowing a negative definition oh say, femininity is being CARED for by a man cause we wimmins just cant seem to do it ourselves.
sigh...
that is why i do not accept any of this crap. none of it makes a lick of sense to me. what i pull out of it is ...
lets take leadership. there are lots of very masculine men that have no desire, ability, or want to be in a leadership role. i wouldnt want them to feel any less a man.
and that leadership role gets awfully close to that leadership role in a family that the rw christian coalition harps on, so i am really weary with that one.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)look at your right hand laid flat in front of you, palm down. is your ring finger longer than your index? a sure sign of the amount of T that you received in utero. the more T, the longer your ring finger is in relation. good studies on this if you google "d2:d4 ratio" and a place to start.
bio mechanics is god.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)T family of men. manly men. all that in being a man. and still, both brothers were very much the nurturers in their families, with their kids. they both ended up with custody of the kids and they both were the ones to raise the kids.
i on the other hand, have been told repeatedly i am very feminine. i always felt masculine, cause all those man traits are what i excelled at. competitive sports for two decades. management roles, and nothing passive about me.
but... i get a surprising comment about me being anything but. that i am very feminine. dont know why. clueless.
and the whole T role has been shifting and changing over the last couple years and T does not mean aggression and violence. and also show benevolence and altruism. so, what definition of T are you using in your definition of masculinity?
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)again, there is quite a body of knowledge on the subject that is well documented and peer reviewed.
also, men have on average 12 times more than the average female. its the elixir of health for a man. you should also read up on inmunosupression and testosterone in males. fascinating stuff.
we all are, after all...monkeys with thumbs and a pre-frontal cortex that allows us to engage higher functioning and well, lie.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)go to the monkey most often and consistently. i have read a lot of T and E/P/T in women. it is all fascinating.
i am, hands down, the MOST aggressive in my family of four, by far. i call it passionate. hubby, two sons, and i (the mom).
talking monkeys is about the time for me to walk away from any hope of conversation.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)that's your call.
Response to galileoreloaded (Reply #32)
seabeyond This message was self-deleted by its author.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)The fact that I see the definition of "nurture" as different from the one my wife uses doesn't mean I have the authority to invalidate her definition of feminine on that basis.
To me, nurturing is to bandage the scraped knee and encourage the child to climb the tree again, but avoid that branch.
And leadership does not mean CEO. At its most basic form, leadership is the conscious decision to promote positive actions by the people around you through whatever mechanism is appropriate. It's putting money in the Jerry's kids jar at the 7-11 despite the fact that making a surreptitious withdrawal would be in your personal self-interest.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)definition of leadership (that i truly love and admire and want to adopt) is my definition of being a mom.
and how you define nurturing is right there too.
i really like you lumber... mostly. lol
Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)find a truly masculine male and look at the women that flock to him. the more masculine, the more feminine the woman. its a polarity thing and has NOTHING to do with money.
bio-mechanics is god.
here is a good example in picture:
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)I don't think a costume defines or even necessarily reflects masculinity.
I think Bernie Sanders is masculine.
"I'm right about this, and I won't change my tune -ever- because the issue is bigger than me and my personal interests."
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)I think Bernie Sanders is masculine.
But it seems that I'm not the only one.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)I think they're both rhetorically constructed.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)rejected social conditioning that defined them, and the job well done they are doing in defining themselves, cements it.
men use to not have to be told all the time they were men. something has happened today. and i think it is sad. i do not reject lumbers effort here. i think he is on a very good path, in this discussion. but, i really do not get how we can use these definition for just some.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)I'm saying that if someone is going to call me masculine, I'm not going to put all that much weight on their definition of the term.
I don't take masculine as an insult precisely because I don't recognize their authority to create the definition.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)as you can see, it is something i have yet to be able to do. but, it is something i am very interested in.
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)need to be defined at all
Just let folks be folks
All this genderizing makes no sense to me at all
The traits you list are all traits that I hold dear as a female born human
So confusing to me
seabeyond and I have many similar thoughts on this
(sorry again about my busted punctuation keys)
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)positive attributes in the overwhelming face of negative attributes being thrown at us.
Largely speaking, when most people talk about women, they speak of nurturing, kindness, loving, comfort and when they talk about men, they talk about aggression, violence.
This OP, in my opinion, is a response to that rather than an attempt to limit the definition of masculinity.
Trying to "reclaim" the term masculine and see it in a more positive light so that we, as men, can aim for higher ideals.
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)It can see usefulness from that perspective for sure.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)and I get called a libertarian poopy-head, or worse.
RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)I'm female and take the garbage and recyclables out every week. My husband mows the lawn and I really want to learn but he likes doing it but isn't opposed to teaching me.
I got rid of a half eaten chimpmunk the other day thanks to our cat.
My husband does most of the grocery shopping; he loves it I hate it.
He has never gotten into a physical altercation in his life. Embarrassingly, I have thrown a few punches a long time ago at men and women. It sounds low class, but I had a temper and it was usually sticking up for friends or someone said something really rude that I went off on. You would never know it by looking at me, but I have a mean right hook.
This OP makes me think of William Hurt in The Big Chill. He was my favorite character and I was so attracted to him even though he couldn't "perform."
Shit, now I probably embarrassed myself with inane rambling so I'm out.
Edited to add: I probably didn't respond accurately to what the OP was questioning. Sorry...have been really busy and checked in briefly. My husband is very mellow, low key and respectful to all women and men. I'm the one that will usually battle someone verbally although he gets into discussions about politics with co-workers but they are "friendly." About 5 years ago we went to this huge neighborhood bash and I got into it with another neighbor (I initiated) but it was friendly banter and then another neighbor (who are the only other liberals in our hood and we are now good friends) chimed in. It was when the death panel bullshit was going around. I was pretty under the influence and he (the dem) lives right across the street so he bummed a ride home as his wife left early with their baby and I was like "do yo have any gas money? Oh yeah, never mind I'm not a republican." I thought that was pretty freaking funny on my part. I always fill my guy on certain "controversies" here and he always agrees with me and other members who share the same opinions. He and I have so much in common...politics, humor, music...etc.
I have a pretty foul mouth and my husband rarely swears. He can be a hardass at work (he's referred to as Tony Soprano). I love my makeup and considered certain plastic surgeries which he was against because he didn't think I needed them but said it was my decision.
I just think it's really hard to define. Btw, he does have #4 down as well.
Sorry again for the rant...good topic that made me think.
HuskiesHowls
(711 posts)In other words, for me, they are the antithesis of each other. However, no one is truly at one end of the scale or the other. All people fall in between the ends, having both masculine and feminine characteristics in their psychological makeup. How do we deal with, and integrate those traits in our lives: That is the question.
To me, the better question would be "What is it to be a Man".
Or, conversely, for women, the question would be "What is it to be a Woman".
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)oh, sorry, that's "love"
westerebus
(2,977 posts)Like the judge that was asked to define pornography who said he did not have a good definition, but, knew what it was when he saw it, so too is masculinity.
I'll take it one step further, the men on DU see it when they look in the mirror and those that know them are better off for it.
scubasteve76
(16 posts)I don't see anything wrong with embracing things that are considered stereotypically masculine. There is a bit of aggressiveness that I think is part of our pscyhi which may play into some of those stereotypical male things. Do little boys smash bugs because it's powerful, or because they want to kill? This is where a major responsibility comes in. A man has to be compassionate and understanding. Both to others and to themselves. All men are different. Do all men crave power? If so, how is that power defined? Power through peace and justice or power through hurting and oppressing other people.....
Sorry for getting too deep on my second post...... I'll find my voice
here2help
(10 posts)JOHN CENA