Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
Related: About this forumReposted for discussion here
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4962444
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1993 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reposted for discussion here (Original Post)
Major Nikon
May 2014
OP
rrneck
(17,671 posts)1. Nobody does anything for just one reason. Ever. nt
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)2. Excellent. n/t
Major Nikon
(36,911 posts)3. The best part was the replies to the debunking
Q. What is your response to the biological evidence of gender preference in babies?
No, the evidence that debunked our "hypothesis" doesn't change anything.
"I have what you would call a theoretical basis. There is no room for biology in there for me."
Both questioned the researchers motives for debunking them.
Claimed science can't prove them wrong, yet had no basis in science for their "hypothesis".
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)4. And they call themselves academics.
one of the biggest travesties of the broader phenomenon is their having turned universities into churches, complete with heresy and dogma.
I particularly liked the eyeroll of the Norweigian sociologist early in the program, questioning the reasons for asking the question. This is university! Why are you asking questions!